Author
Listed:
- Kenji Itao
- Kunihiko Kaneko
Abstract
Several tiers of social organization with varying economic and social disparities have been observed. However, a quantitative characterization of the types and the causal mechanisms for the transitions have hardly been explained. While anthropologists have emphasized that gift exchange, rather than market exchange, prevails in traditional societies and shapes social relations, few mathematical studies have explored its consequences for social organizations. In this study, we present a simple model of competitive gift-giving that describes how gifts bring goods to the recipient and honor to the donor, and simulate social change. Numerical simulations and an analysis of the corresponding mean-field theory demonstrate the transitions between the following four phases with different distribution shapes of wealth and social reputation: the band, without economic or social disparities; the tribe, with economic but without social disparities; the chiefdom, with both; and the kingdom, with economic disparity and weak social disparity except for an outlier, namely, the “monarch”. The emergence of strong disparities is characterized by power law distributions and is attributed to the “rich get richer” process. In contrast, the absence of such a process leads to exponential distributions due to random fluctuations. The phases depend on the parameters characterizing the frequency and scale of gift interactions. Our findings provide quantitative criteria for classifying social organizations based on economic and social disparities, consistent with both anthropological theory and empirical observations. Thus, we propose empirically measurable explanatory variables and characteristic indices for the evolution of social organizations. The constructive model, guided by social scientific theory, can provide the basic mechanistic explanation of social evolution and integrate theories of the social sciences.Author summary: Human societies have experienced transitions between different types of organizations, including bands, tribes, chiefdoms, and kingdoms. However, quantitative characterizations of the types and mechanisms of transitions have yet to be established. Meanwhile, anthropologists have observed that gift-giving is prevalent in traditional societies and that it enhances social status by imposing reciprocal obligations on others. By constructing a simple model of gift interactions, we demonstrate that competitive gift-giving generates socioeconomic disparities characterized by power law distributions of wealth and social reputation. Consequently, numerical results and corresponding mean-field theory elucidate the above organizational types as distinct phases that depend on the frequency and scale of gift-giving. These findings provide the quantitative criteria for classifying social organizations in human history, together with the potential explanatory variables that can be empirically measured for anthropology, history, and archaeology. This study explains the mechanism of social evolution driven by gift-giving and provides a theoretical framework for the social sciences from the perspective of statistical physics.
Suggested Citation
Kenji Itao & Kunihiko Kaneko, 2024.
"Emergence of economic and social disparities through competitive gift-giving,"
PLOS Complex Systems, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(1), pages 1-16, September.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pcsy00:0000001
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcsy.0000001
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcsy00:0000001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: complexsystem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/complexsystems/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.