IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pclm00/0001088.html

Comparison of data-driven and numerical weather prediction models for rainfall nowcasting in major cities of Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Sumia Akter
  • Jayeef Rahman Muaz
  • Rabiul Awal

Abstract

Flood-prone Bangladesh requires accurate short-term rainfall prediction, yet conventional numerical weather prediction (NWP) models remain computationally intensive and regionally limited in skill. This study evaluates and compares four deep learning (DL) architectures — Simple Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Stacked LSTM, Bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM), and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) — against the physics-based Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model for one-hour-ahead rainfall forecasting across six climatologically diverse stations in Bangladesh. Each model was trained independently per station using hourly ERA5 reanalysis data spanning 2018–2024, and performance was assessed using both regression and binary detection metrics. Across the full test period, Simple LSTM achieved the strongest overall performance, explaining approximately 88% of ERA5 rainfall variance with the lowest prediction errors, while GRU produced nearly comparable results. Performance was consistently stronger at wetter stations such as Chittagong and Sylhet than at drier northwestern stations such as Rajshahi and Rangpur, where class imbalance and rainfall intermittency limited model skill. Event-category analysis across 10 WRF simulation events — spanning extreme, moderate, and weak rainfall regimes — showed that DL models demonstrated closest agreement with ERA5 reference values during extreme events, while skill declined notably during weak events due to near-zero rainfall conditions. WRF exhibited systematic overestimation, temporal displacement of peak rainfall, and strongly negative R² values across all event categories and stations. A Friedman test confirmed statistically significant differences in RMSE ranks among the four DL architectures (χ² = 10.60, p = 0.014), with a Nemenyi post-hoc test showing Simple LSTM significantly outperformed Stacked LSTM (p = 0.0095).

Suggested Citation

  • Sumia Akter & Jayeef Rahman Muaz & Rabiul Awal, 2026. "Comparison of data-driven and numerical weather prediction models for rainfall nowcasting in major cities of Bangladesh," PLOS Climate, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-28, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pclm00:0001088
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pclm.0001088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0001088
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/climate/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0001088&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pclm.0001088?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pclm00:0001088. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: climate (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/climate .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.