IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pclm00/0000894.html

Rainfall-driven disruptions in respiratory epidemic surveillance: Evidence from COVID-19 in France and New York State

Author

Listed:
  • Susanna Caruso
  • Claudio Ascione
  • Eugenio Valdano

Abstract

Extreme weather events can disrupt human behavior and access to health services, possibly affecting the surveillance of respiratory epidemics. Rainfall, in particular, can reduce the uptake of diagnostic testing, delay the detection of infections, and amplify the disadvantages faced by vulnerable populations. We examined this effect using the COVID-19 pandemic as a case study, analyzing daily testing activity in mainland France and New York State between May 15, 2020, and November 1, 2021. COVID-19 testing data were combined with daily rainfall and local socioeconomic indicators. Epidemic trends and weekly seasonality were extracted using time series modeling and incorporated into a spatial mixed-effect Poisson model to quantify the impact of rainfall on testing rates and to explore its variation with local rainfall profiles and income levels. Rainfall was consistently associated with reduced testing in both France and New York State. Nationally, 25 millimeters of rainfall in one day were linked to a 7 percent reduction in testing in France and around a 5 percent reduction in New York State. Spatial patterns revealed that decreases were more pronounced in poorer areas, while locations accustomed to frequent light rainfall showed weaker effects. These findings, across diverse geographies and climates, show that rainfall can hinder respiratory epidemic surveillance by reducing testing, and compounds socioeconomic and climatic vulnerabilities. Recognizing and mitigating weather-driven disruptions, and investigating their drivers, is essential to strengthen epidemic surveillance and maintain timely detection under a changing climate.

Suggested Citation

  • Susanna Caruso & Claudio Ascione & Eugenio Valdano, 2026. "Rainfall-driven disruptions in respiratory epidemic surveillance: Evidence from COVID-19 in France and New York State," PLOS Climate, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-12, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pclm00:0000894
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000894
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000894
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/climate/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000894&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000894?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charlie B Fischer & Nedghie Adrien & Jeremiah J Silguero & Julianne J Hopper & Abir I Chowdhury & Martha M Werler, 2021. "Mask adherence and rate of COVID-19 across the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-10, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Faina Linkov & Christopher L. Cummings & David J. Dausey, 2024. "Official risk communication for COVID-19 and beyond: can we do a better job?," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 293-300, June.
    2. Tongzhou Lyu & Rongling Long & Yongxin Zhao & Zhiyong Song & Xin Ma & Zhixiong Yang, 2025. "Citizen’s Policy Compliance With Stringent Measures in Public Health Crisis: Evidence From China’s COVID-19 Response," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, December.
    3. James Broughel & Michael Kotrous, 2021. "The benefits of coronavirus suppression: A cost-benefit analysis of the response to the first wave of COVID-19 in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-20, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pclm00:0000894. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: climate (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/climate .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.