IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pclm00/0000806.html

Landscape-scale assessment of the contribution of improved Urochloa humidicola pastures to soil organic carbon stocks enhancement in the Colombian Llanos

Author

Listed:
  • Mike Bastidas
  • Javier M Martín-López
  • Sandra Loaiza
  • Jacobo Arango
  • Mayesse da Silva
  • Leonardo Rodriguez
  • Natalia Matiz-Rubio
  • Juliana Arias
  • Idupulapati M Rao
  • Ciniro Costa Junior

Abstract

Tropical grasslands can sequester substantial soil organic carbon (SOC), yet the temporal dynamics of SOC across soil layers—particularly in deep horizons—remain poorly understood at landscape scale. This study presents the first large-scale, stratified assessment of SOC stocks under Urochloa humidicola pastures in the Colombian Llanos. We evaluated SOC stocks and related soil properties (soil texture and bulk density) across pasture age classes (Uh 1, Uh 2, Uh 3, and Uh > 3 years), and compared them to conventionally managed, regularly burned savanna areas (CBS). Soil samples were collected from 111 georeferenced field sites at four depths (0–10 cm, 10–30 cm, 30–50 cm, and 50–100 cm), and SOC stocks were calculated using the equivalent soil mass (ESM) approach. Results revealed a consistent increment in both SOC concentration and SOC stocks with increasing pasture age. Total SOC stocks (0–100 cm) were up to 35% higher in older pastures (Uh > 3 years) compared to CBS, corresponding to an average gain of ~27 Mg C ha⁻¹. These gains were observed in both soil layers, with ~8.5 Mg C ha⁻¹ (19.5%) in the topsoil (0–30 cm) and ~14.8 Mg C ha⁻¹ (39%) in the subsoil (30–100 cm). Accumulated SOC tends to be more stable in these deeper soil layers. SOC concentration patterns align with these trends, supporting its use as an early indicator of soil improvement. Soil texture and hydrological (drainage) conditions influenced SOC concentration and stock changes, with clay-rich and water-retentive soils accumulated significantly more SOC than sandy-texture soils. These results highlight the climate mitigation potential of improved tropical pastures and the importance of stratified, depth-resolved monitoring of SOC stocks. U. humidicola pastures show progressive, spatially heterogeneous SOC gains, supporting the strategy of sustainable intensification of tropical grazing systems and their integration into carbon crediting mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Mike Bastidas & Javier M Martín-López & Sandra Loaiza & Jacobo Arango & Mayesse da Silva & Leonardo Rodriguez & Natalia Matiz-Rubio & Juliana Arias & Idupulapati M Rao & Ciniro Costa Junior, 2026. "Landscape-scale assessment of the contribution of improved Urochloa humidicola pastures to soil organic carbon stocks enhancement in the Colombian Llanos," PLOS Climate, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(1), pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pclm00:0000806
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000806
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/climate/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000806&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000806?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pclm00:0000806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: climate (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/climate .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.