IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pclm00/0000765.html

It’s not just risk—it’s responsibility: Changing drivers of home flood protection

Author

Listed:
  • Mikhail Sirenko
  • Tatiana Filatova

Abstract

Private household adaptation is a critical yet underutilised element of flood resilience. Property-level measures might reduce up to 80% of damage if adopted in a timely manner. However, socio-behavioural factors serve as constraints to adaptation. Among them, a lack of risk awareness is considered a primary barrier. Empirical research typically relies on a single snapshot of data, implicitly assuming these factors are stable over time. Using two nationally representative survey waves from the Netherlands (2020 and 2023), we examine how factors of household intentions to implement six structural home-flood protection measures change. Counterintuitively, despite a major flood in 2021, by 2023, we find lower adaptation intentions (an 11.6 percentage point decline), lower flood worry, and reduced self-efficacy. This coincided with a marked shift in perceived responsibility for flood risk toward the government (12 percentage point increase), while the actual uptake of private adaptation measures remained low (2–5%). Regression analysis reveals a reordering of behavioural drivers: in 2020, prior flood experience, self-efficacy, and flood worry were the most prominent predictors, though perception of responsibility was also consistently significant. By 2023, perception of responsibility emerges as the strongest and most consistent predictor of intention to act (odds ratio 2.4), while the importance of flood experience and worry declines. These results suggest that household drivers for adaptation are volatile, relying not only on a household’s experience and capacity to act but also on the understanding of shared responsibility between citizens and the state. “Empowering” households only with information about potential flood risk, while rationally sound, may not result in an intention to protect homes. Climate adaptation policy design that embraces private action must therefore include: clear responsibility framing, support for skills development and the efficacy of measures, targeted financial incentives, and adaptability to account for evolving public attitudes, even over short timeframes.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikhail Sirenko & Tatiana Filatova, 2026. "It’s not just risk—it’s responsibility: Changing drivers of home flood protection," PLOS Climate, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pclm00:0000765
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000765
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/climate/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000765&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000765?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mahmoud Elkasabi & Z Tuba Suzer-Gurtekin & Yuxuan Chen, 2023. "A framework for sample size calculations in longitudinal surveys to measure net and gross changes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Bagstad, Kenneth J. & Stapleton, Kevin & D'Agostino, John R., 2007. "Taxes, subsidies, and insurance as drivers of United States coastal development," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2-3), pages 285-298, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Céline Grislain-Letrémy & Bertrand Villeneuve, 2019. "Natural disasters, land-use, and insurance," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, Springer;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 44(1), pages 54-86, March.
    2. Hélène Rey-Valette & Marie-Laure Lambert & Gisèle Vianey & Bénédicte Rulleau & Camille André & Nicole Lautrédou-Audouy, 2018. "Acceptabilité des relocalisations des biens face à l’élévation du niveau de la mer : perceptions de nouveaux dispositifs de gouvernance du foncier," Géographie, économie, société, Lavoisier, vol. 20(3), pages 359-379.
    3. José Daniel López-Barrientos & Ekaterina Viktorovna Gromova & Ekaterina Sergeevna Miroshnichenko, 2020. "Resource Exploitation in a Stochastic Horizon under Two Parametric Interpretations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-29, July.
    4. Céline Grislain-Letrémy & Bertrand Villeneuve, 2011. "Natural and Industrial Disasters : Land Use and Insurance," Working Papers 2011-32, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    5. Duxbury, Jane & Dickinson, Sarah, 2007. "Principles for sustainable governance of the coastal zone: In the context of coastal disasters," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2-3), pages 319-330, August.
    6. Liu, Xian & Noonan, Douglas, 2022. "Building underwater: Effects of community-scale flood management on housing development," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    7. Dinan, Terry, 2017. "Projected Increases in Hurricane Damage in the United States: The Role of Climate Change and Coastal Development," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 186-198.
    8. Koen de Koning & Tatiana Filatova & Okmyung Bin, 2019. "Capitalization of Flood Insurance and Risk Perceptions in Housing Prices: An Empirical Agent‐Based Model Approach," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 85(4), pages 1159-1179, April.
    9. Douglas S. Noonan & Xian Liu, 2019. "Heading for the Hills? Effects of Community Flood Management on Local Adaptation to Flood Risks," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 86(2), pages 800-822, October.
    10. repec:plo:pone00:0233888 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Bixter, Michael T. & Luhmann, Christian C., 2014. "Shared losses reduce sensitivity to risk: A laboratory study of moral hazard," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 63-73.
    12. Douglas S. Noonan & Abdul‐Akeem A. Sadiq, 2018. "Flood Risk Management: Exploring the Impacts of the Community Rating System Program on Poverty and Income Inequality," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(3), pages 489-503, March.
    13. Arnaud Goussebaïle, 2016. "Risk prevention in cities prone to natural hazards," Working Papers hal-01358734, HAL.
    14. Noonan, Douglas S. & Sadiq, Abdul-Akeem, 2019. "Community-scale Flood Risk Management: Effects of a Voluntary National Program on Migration and Development," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 92-99.
    15. Conte, Marc N. & Kelly, David L., 2018. "An imperfect storm: Fat-tailed tropical cyclone damages, insurance, and climate policy," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 677-706.
    16. Natalie R. Sampson & Carmel E. Price & Julia Kassem & Jessica Doan & Janine Hussein, 2018. "“We’re Just Sitting Ducks”: Recurrent Household Flooding as An Underreported Environmental Health Threat in Detroit’s Changing Climate," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Mohammad Sirajul Islam & Mohammad Shamsuddoha, 2023. "Assessing Sustainability Governance and Its Dimensions," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 12(2), pages 158-175, June.
    18. Richard M. Vogel, 2012. "Politics, diversity and the distribution of federal disaster assistance," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 1(2), pages 37-42.
    19. Branham, Jordan & Onda, Kyle & Kaza, Nikhil & BenDor, Todd K. & Salvesen, David, 2021. "How does the removal of federal subsidies affect investment in coastal protection infrastructure?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    20. Li, Huiying & Wang, Xinchun & Chang, Yu & Zhang, Nan & Huang, Wei & Wang, Quanren, 2025. "Central government Ownership, geographic Distance, and firm Innovation: Evidence from Chinese State-owned enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    21. Gaddis, Erica Brown & Miles, Brian & Morse, Stephanie & Lewis, Debby, 2007. "Full-cost accounting of coastal disasters in the United States: Implications for planning and preparedness," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2-3), pages 307-318, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pclm00:0000765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: climate (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/climate .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.