IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pclm00/0000754.html

Comparative and complementary use of Bayesian inference and supervised learning for predictive modeling of coffee rust incidence among Kenyan smallholder farmers

Author

Listed:
  • Maurice Wanyonyi
  • Jacqueline Gogo Akelo
  • Veronicah Nyokabi Njenga
  • Frankline Obwoge Keraro
  • Titus Mutua Kioko

Abstract

Hemileia vastatrix, the causal agent of coffee leaf rust, poses a persistent threat to Arabica coffee production in Kenya, where smallholder farmers face recurrent yield losses and limited access to effective control strategies. Effective disease management requires predictive frameworks capable of quantifying both infection risk and associated uncertainty under real-world farm conditions. This study presents a comparative evaluation of Bayesian hierarchical inference and supervised machine learning approaches for predicting coffee rust incidence, using their complementary strengths to generate probabilistic predictions. The models were developed using longitudinal data from 9,850 plot-level observations across six major coffee-producing counties in Kenya. Microclimatic moisture variables, particularly leaf wetness duration and relative humidity, emerged as the dominant predictors of infection. Partial dependence and SHAP analyses revealed strong nonlinear threshold effects: elevated humidity and prolonged leaf wetness sharply increased infection probability, while proximity to infected farms intensified spatial transmission dynamics. A key finding is that parsimonious, interpretable models performed competitively with complex algorithms. Logistic regression achieved the highest discriminative performance (AUC ROC = 0.867), matching or exceeding more complex ensemble methods while maintaining transparency and computational efficiency. Ensemble models such as random forests achieved slightly higher classification accuracy, highlighting complementary strengths across approaches. The Bayesian hierarchical model contributed additional value by quantifying uncertainty and accounting for unobserved heterogeneity across counties. These findings demonstrate that interpretable models can perform as well as complex machine learning algorithms in this context, an important insight for resource-limited agricultural settings. The proposed framework offers a scalable, transparent decision-support tool for precision disease management and enhances the resilience of smallholder coffee systems in Kenya and similar tropical environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Maurice Wanyonyi & Jacqueline Gogo Akelo & Veronicah Nyokabi Njenga & Frankline Obwoge Keraro & Titus Mutua Kioko, 2026. "Comparative and complementary use of Bayesian inference and supervised learning for predictive modeling of coffee rust incidence among Kenyan smallholder farmers," PLOS Climate, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-25, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pclm00:0000754
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000754
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/climate/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000754&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000754?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pclm00:0000754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: climate (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/climate .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.