IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pclm00/0000604.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards dynamic evaluations: Assessing the politics of Stavanger’s free public transport experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Siddharth Sareen
  • Toon Meelen
  • Håvard Haarstad
  • Saurabh Biswas

Abstract

In this essay we argue for what we term ‘dynamic evaluation’ of transport policies. In a time of increasing political polarization of public transport, dynamic evaluations involve a broader scope of factors and indicators, including political processes and justice, compared to traditional evaluations typically centered on ridership. We illustrate this perspective by discussing the experiment of free public transport provision in Stavanger, Norway during July-December 2023. Planned and budgeted for a year shortly before local elections, the intervention was repealed halfway through, as the new governing political coalition held that this was a sub-optimal means to deliver public transport policies. We contrast a traditional commissioned evaluation of how the experiment modestly increased ridership with a dynamic evaluation involving broader political and justice processes, to illustrate that the experiment contributed to politicizing public transport in potentially transformative ways.

Suggested Citation

  • Siddharth Sareen & Toon Meelen & Håvard Haarstad & Saurabh Biswas, 2025. "Towards dynamic evaluations: Assessing the politics of Stavanger’s free public transport experiment," PLOS Climate, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(4), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pclm00:0000604
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000604
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/climate/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000604&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000604?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pclm00:0000604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: climate (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/climate .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.