IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pclm00/0000599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is there a public mandate for restricting advertising of high-carbon products and services?: Citizens’ jury and public polling evidence from the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Jacob Ainscough
  • Rebecca Willis

Abstract

Meeting internationally-agreed climate targets requires changes to patterns of consumption of goods and services which result in high levels of greenhouse gas emissions, such as petrol and diesel cars, flights, meat and dairy products. Previous experience with advertising controls for tobacco, unhealthy food and gambling, for example, suggests these could play a role in shifting consumption behaviours and thus achieving decarbonisation targets. This paper assess public support for such controls in the United Kingdom. We present evidence from a mixed method study combining a deliberative citizens’ jury and a large nationally representative poll. We find majority support for the principle of greater restrictions on advertising of high carbon products and services. The most popular form of intervention tested is a ‘traffic light’ labelling system and the least popular is an outright ban. We identify five distinct positions on the issue, ranging from objecting to all proposals to strongly supporting all proposals. We conclude by discussing the implications of our evidence for political efforts to increase controls on advertising of high-carbon products and services.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacob Ainscough & Rebecca Willis, 2025. "Is there a public mandate for restricting advertising of high-carbon products and services?: Citizens’ jury and public polling evidence from the UK," PLOS Climate, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(9), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pclm00:0000599
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000599
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/climate/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000599&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000599?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pclm00:0000599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: climate (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/climate .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.