IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pclm00/0000589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

KlimaSeniorinnen case: Climate change legal scholarship needs empiricism, not hype KlimaSeniorinnen case: Climate change legal scholarship needs empiricism, not hype

Author

Listed:
  • Julien Bétaille
  • Guillaume Chapron

Abstract

In April 2024, the European Court of Human Rights ruled in the KlimaSeniorinnen case that Switzerland had not implemented a legal framework capable of addressing climate change and that this constituted a violation of the right to private and family life. Despite being celebrated as “historic,” this ruling reflects established case law rather than a legal breakthrough. Hyperbolic reactions reveal a lack of empirical rigor in legal commentary, which undermines evidence-based climate policymaking. We caution against exaggerating the impact of individual rulings, given limited evidence of their influence on climate policies and emissions reductions, and encourage legal scholars to instead adopt methodological rigor akin to practices in other scientific disciplines. Specifically, we advocate for empirical approaches in law, through comprehensive data collection, robust statistical methods, and systematic analysis to better understand the role of courts in climate change mitigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Julien Bétaille & Guillaume Chapron, 2025. "KlimaSeniorinnen case: Climate change legal scholarship needs empiricism, not hype KlimaSeniorinnen case: Climate change legal scholarship needs empiricism, not hype," PLOS Climate, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(3), pages 1-4, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pclm00:0000589
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosclimate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000589
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000589&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000589?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pclm00:0000589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: climate (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/climate .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.