Author
Listed:
- Tania Guillén Bolaños
- Jürgen Scheffran
- Abdel García
- Haydée López
- Marcos A Castillo Lorío
- María Máñez Costa
- Daniela Jacob
Abstract
Adaptation options are being implemented globally to reduce the impacts of current and projected climate change. However, there is still limited information on assessments of the options available, especially related to adaptation research and practice in the Global South. Therefore, we present the local feasibility assessment of climate adaptation options as a methodological advancement, using Puerto Morazán’s (Nicaragua) agriculture and livestock sectors as proof of concept. For this case study, we complement current frameworks with participatory approaches and local expert knowledge to contextualize global narratives on adaptation feasibility and overcome information availability challenges. As a result, we assess sixteen options across the agriculture and livestock sectors. We demonstrate that, depending on the context, not all dimensions and criteria are equally relevant. In Puerto Morazán, the environmental and economic dimensions were the most important. We also confirm that the assessment of the options varies when local priorities are considered. Our results highlight the importance of the local context when identifying adaptation options. Our expanded assessment framework helps assess and generate evidence from the local level, where information is usually limited. The advanced assessment can guide local and subnational adaptation processes and inform other policy or scientific assessments by identifying the dimensions where there might be barriers to implementing adaptation.
Suggested Citation
Tania Guillén Bolaños & Jürgen Scheffran & Abdel García & Haydée López & Marcos A Castillo Lorío & María Máñez Costa & Daniela Jacob, 2025.
"Assessing the feasibility of climate adaptation options using local expertise and participatory approaches: The case of Puerto Morazán, Nicaragua,"
PLOS Climate, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-18, October.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pclm00:0000510
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000510
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pclm00:0000510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: climate (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/climate .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.