Author
Listed:
- Nikola Milićević
- Shawn D Burton
- Matt Wachowiak
- Vladimir Itskov
Abstract
Neural representations in the olfactory bulb (OB) remain poorly understood compared to well-established coding principles in other sensory systems. This difficulty arises because a natural coordinate system for olfactory stimulus space has not yet been identified, complicating the characterization of neural receptive fields analogous to those in other sensory modalities. Moreover, the extent to which these tuning properties are spatially organized within the OB remains unclear. To advance our understanding of the olfactory coding, we introduce an interpretable method of Shapley fields, as an olfactory analog of retinotopic receptive fields. Shapley fields are spatial distributions of chemical feature importance for the tuning of OB glomeruli. We used this tool to investigate chemotopy in the OB with diverse sets of chemical features using widefield epifluorescence recordings of the mouse dorsal OB in response to stimuli across a wide range of the chemical space. We found that Shapley fields reveal a weak chemotopic organization of the chemical feature sensitivity of dorsal OB glomeruli. This organization was consistent across animals and mostly agreed across very different chemical feature sets: (i) the expert-curated PubChem database features and (ii) features derived from a Graph Neural Network trained on human olfactory perceptual tasks. This chemotopy involved at least three chemical feature dimensions, rather than one or two dominant properties. Moreover, we found that the principal components of the Shapley fields corresponded to single commonly accepted chemical classification groups. This implies that these chemical groups could have been identified purely from the mouse olfactory responses. Our findings suggest that Shapley fields may serve as a chemical feature-agnostic method for investigating olfactory perception.Author summary: The sense of smell remains poorly understood compared with other sensory systems in the mammalian brain. This is because there is little understanding of how specific chemical features drive olfactory perception and how these features are spatially organized within the olfactory bulb. We introduce a novel method for understanding the coding properties of olfactory processing in the mammalian brain. Using neural activity in the mouse olfactory bulb, we characterized the non-random organization of chemical sensitivity across the surface of the olfactory bulb. We also found that the chemical sensitivity of mouse olfactory glomeruli, small structures that receive input from smell receptor neurons, was well described by AI-generated chemical features derived from human perceptual data. Rather than forming a simple map dominated by one or two chemical properties, this organization involved at least three effective chemical-feature dimensions. The spatial pattern was weak and mosaic-like: glomeruli with related sensitivities tended to occur near one another, but their responses overlapped rather than forming sharply separated regions. Our results and methods provide a feature-agnostic framework for studying olfactory coding in the mammalian brain.
Suggested Citation
Nikola Milićević & Shawn D Burton & Matt Wachowiak & Vladimir Itskov, 2026.
"Shapley fields reveal mosaic chemotopic organization in the mouse Olfactory bulb across diverse chemical feature sets,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 22(11), pages 1-23, November.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1014917
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014917
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1014917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.