Author
Listed:
- Lín Cóngyǔ
- Prejaas Tewarie
- Naji L N Alnagger
- Iván Mindlin
- Glenn J M Van der Lande
- Laouen Belloli
- Steven Laureys
- Lionel Naccache
- Benjamin Rohaut
- Aurore Thibaut
- Jitka Annen
- Olivia Gosseries
- Pablo Núñez
- Jacobo D Sitt
Abstract
Understanding the neural mechanisms underlying disorders of consciousness (DoC) remains a major challenge, particularly in distinguishing limited awareness in minimally conscious state (MCS) and complete unawareness in unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, also coined vegetative state (UWS/VS). In this multicentre study, we fitted a biophysically informed corticothalamic neural field model to high-density EEG data from two large independent datasets, comprising 203 UWS patients, 270 MCS patients and 74 healthy controls. We then used the fitted parameters to simulate EEG time series on a per-subject basis and compared empirical and simulated complexity metrics. The model reliably captured the spectral features across different states of consciousness and revealed reduced corticothalamic integrity in DoC patients that was more pronounced in UWS than in MCS, supporting the mesocircuit hypothesis. Furthermore, the simulated EEG reproduced the complexity patterns of the empirical recordings, with permutation entropy emerging as a sensitive marker capable of distinguishing between MCS and UWS for both real and simulated time series.Author summary: It is a major challenge in neuroscience and clinical care to understand why some patients show signs of minimal consciousness after severe brain injury, while others remain unaware. In this study, we used a physiologically informed corticothalamic model that describes how different neural populations fire and communicate to generate the electrical signals measured by EEG. By fitting the model to recordings of two large independent datasets of patients and healthy participants, we found that it could reliably reproduce the individual brain activity of different groups. The model parameters that describe the communication between the cortex and thalamus populations were found to be different between patient groups. Furthermore, the model was also able to reproduce important patterns of complexity of the real recordings, as the complexity measures obtained from the simulations were found to be highly correlated with the empirical ones and differed between patients who showed minimal consciousness and patients with unresponsive wakefulness. Together, these findings offer new insight into the brain mechanisms that support consciousness after injury and demonstrate the potential of biophysical modelling to create personalised models for future therapeutic applications.
Suggested Citation
Lín Cóngyǔ & Prejaas Tewarie & Naji L N Alnagger & Iván Mindlin & Glenn J M Van der Lande & Laouen Belloli & Steven Laureys & Lionel Naccache & Benjamin Rohaut & Aurore Thibaut & Jitka Annen & Olivia , 2026.
"Individualised electrophysiological neural field models for the assessment of thalamocortical function in disorders of consciousness: A multicentre study,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 22(10), pages 1-26, October.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1014905
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014905
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1014905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.