IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1014802.html

Dynamic vibration-driven feedback shapes predator–prey interactions in an orb-weaving spider

Author

Listed:
  • Hsin-Yi Hung
  • Abel Corver
  • Andrew Gordus

Abstract

Animals flexibly adjust their movements in real time to capture prey using environmental sensory cues. While sensorimotor transformations have been extensively studied in visual and somatosensory systems, their structure remains poorly understood in substrate-borne vibration sensing. Here, we combined high-resolution web vibration recordings, capable of resolving micrometer-scale displacements, with fine-scale behavioral tracking in the orb-weaving spider Uloborus diversus to investigate how vibration sensing guides prey capture. Using unsupervised modeling, we identified distinct behavioral states and their typical temporal sequence during capture. Predictive generalized linear models revealed reciprocal predator–prey dynamics: when Drosophila vibrations weakened, spiders often switched to actions such as crouching or shaking that enhanced signal detectability. These active phases were followed by static phases marked by increased pure fly-induced vibration power, consistent with an active sampling strategy. Conversely, flies tended to freeze during spider movement and struggled when the spider was still. Spiders also reliably oriented toward the web radius with the highest vibrational amplitude, indicating an amplitude-based strategy for prey localization. Together, our findings reveal a structured sensorimotor transformation linking external vibration cues to the spider’s behavioral choices, forming a dynamic feedback loop between vibratory stimulus and movement. This work uncovers general principles of active sensing and closed-loop control in a non-visual invertebrate and suggests that similar strategies may underlie sensorimotor control across diverse animal systems.Author summary: Orb-weaving spiders rely on vibrations traveling through their webs to detect and locate prey. These signals, however, can be weak or change as prey struggle. We studied whether the Uloborus diversus adjusts its own movements to improve how it senses these vibrations. Using high-speed video to measure web motions and machine-learning tools to track spider body posture, we examined how spiders respond when prey-generated signals fluctuate. We discovered that spiders do not passively wait for signals; instead, they engage in a dynamic feedback loop with their prey. When vibrations from the fly weaken, the spider triggers specific movements—crouching or shaking—which actively amplify the prey’s signal. These actions are followed by precise orientation toward the prey. Our findings suggest that spiders can influence the sensory information available to them, rather than relying solely on passive detection. This work provides insight into how animals with simple nervous systems may use movement to shape their perception of the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Hsin-Yi Hung & Abel Corver & Andrew Gordus, 2026. "Dynamic vibration-driven feedback shapes predator–prey interactions in an orb-weaving spider," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 22(9), pages 1-26, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1014802
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014802
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014802&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014802?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1014802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.