IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1014666.html

Simple birth-death-mutation models predict some—but not all—aspects of the experimental evolution of antibiotic resistance

Author

Listed:
  • Elin Lilja
  • Rosalind J Allen
  • Bartlomiej Waclaw

Abstract

Mathematical modelling of antibiotic resistance plays an important role in understanding the mechanisms of resistance emergence and spreading, testing the feasibility of new treatment protocols, and antimicrobial stewardship. However, many assumptions underlying some of the most commonly used mathematical models have not been rigorously tested experimentally. We verify whether one of these models - a birth-death-mutation process - is able to quantitatively predict the outcome of laboratory experiments. We grow bacteria in a bioreactor in conditions that closely resemble the assumptions of the model, and compare the model predictions with experimental observables such as the probability and time to resistance evolution, mutant number distribution, and the genetic composition of the evolved populations. We show that the model fails to reproduce some aspects of the experiments (failing differently for different antibiotics) but that simple modifications of the model significantly improve its predictive power. These modifications give insight into the population dynamics of resistant mutants for each antibiotic tested, and highlight the importance of quantitative modelling for accurate prediction of antibiotic resistance evolution.Author summary: Mathematical models are central to the study of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) because they can test mechanistic concepts, reveal processes that are difficult to observe experimentally, and predict the evolution of resistance. Surprisingly, however, these models are rarely tested against quantitative data. Here we rigorously test the predictions of one of the most widely used AMR models—the birth-death process with mutations. Using a bioreactor, we perform carefully controlled experiments in which bacteria evolve resistance to three different antibiotics. The standard, widely-used birth-death-mutation model cannot reproduce our data but augmenting it with antibiotic-specific mechanistic information can significantly increase its predictive power. Our work highlights the necessity of quantitative comparisons between AMR models and experiments. It also shows what additional factors must be considered to improve the predictions of such models, ultimately helping researchers develop new treatments that benefit from rather than being thwarted by microbial evolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Elin Lilja & Rosalind J Allen & Bartlomiej Waclaw, 2026. "Simple birth-death-mutation models predict some—but not all—aspects of the experimental evolution of antibiotic resistance," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 22(8), pages 1-23, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1014666
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014666
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014666&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014666?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1014666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.