IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1014461.html

GHF-ACL: A novel contrastive learning framework with multi-order graph structures for herb-disease association prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Yunmeng Zhang
  • Xiuhong Wu
  • Qiutong Wang
  • Lin Shi
  • Meiling Liu
  • Guohua Wang

Abstract

Predicting Herb–Disease Associations (HDA) is pivotal for modernizing Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM); however, this is impeded by data heterogeneity and the complex, multi-component mechanisms of herbal medicines. Existing drug–disease prediction models often struggle to capture high-order structural patterns and resolve semantic inconsistencies intrinsic to herbs. To overcome these limitations, we present HData, a standardized benchmark dataset that integrates herbal medicinal properties, chemical compositions, and disease associations. We further propose GHF-ACL, a novel multi-order graph contrastive learning framework designed for HDA prediction. Specifically, GHF-ACL explicitly models low-order functional similarities via a herb–disease similarity graph while capturing high-order component interactions through a herb–chemical hypergraph. Furthermore, an adaptive gating-guided structural interaction module aligns heterogeneous graph representations into a unified latent space, and hierarchical contrastive learning enforces consistency across structural views. Extensive experiments on five datasets demonstrate that GHF-ACL achieves superior or competitive performance over six state-of-the-art models across most metrics, with significant improvements over the best-performing baseline model in AUPR (+4.8% on LRSSL, + 3.81% on Cdata), F1 score, and Recall. These results underscore the model’s superior capability in detecting true positive associations within imbalanced biomedical data. By synergizing multi-view graph modeling, semantic fusion, and contrastive regularization, this work establishes a unified framework for HDA prediction, offering valuable insights for computational TCM and data-driven drug discovery.Author summary: Traditional Chinese Medicine has been used for centuries, but understanding how it works at a scientific level is still difficult. One reason is that herbs are naturally complex. Instead of relying on a single active substance, most herbs contain many components that work together to influence the body. This makes them hard to study using modern computer tools that are designed for simpler drugs. In our work, we aim to make this complexity easier to understand using artificial intelligence. We first collected and organized scattered information about herbs and diseases into a single, standardized data resource. We then built a computer model that looks not only at similarities between herbs and diseases, but also at how different components within an herb may work together. When we tested our approach, it was more successful than existing methods at identifying meaningful connections between herbs and diseases. As an example, our model highlighted a possible role for the herb Niuxi in treating skin cancers, which aligns with recent biological findings. Overall, we hope our study provides a clearer way to study traditional herbal medicine and helps connect ancient medical knowledge with modern, data-driven drug discovery.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunmeng Zhang & Xiuhong Wu & Qiutong Wang & Lin Shi & Meiling Liu & Guohua Wang, 2026. "GHF-ACL: A novel contrastive learning framework with multi-order graph structures for herb-disease association prediction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 22(6), pages 1-28, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1014461
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014461
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014461&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014461?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1014461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.