Author
Listed:
- Robert Moss
- Ruarai J Tobin
- Mitchell O’Hara-Wild
- Adeshina I Adekunle
- Dennis Liu
- Tobin South
- Dylan J Morris
- Gerard E Ryan
- Tianxiao Hao
- Aarathy Babu
- Katharine L Senior
- James G Wood
- Nick Golding
- Joshua V Ross
- Peter Dawson
- Rob J Hyndman
- David J Price
- James M McCaw
- Freya M Shearer
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries used real-time data analyses, predictive modelling, and COVID-19 case forecasts, to incorporate emerging evidence into their decisions. In Australia, national and jurisdictional public health responses were informed by weekly ensemble forecasts of daily COVID-19 case counts for each of Australia’s eight states and territories, produced by a consortium of researchers under contract with the Australian Government. As members of this consortium, who produced these forecasts at each week, we now retrospectively evaluate approximately 100,000 predictions for daily case counts 1–28 days into the future, generated between July 2020 and December 2022, and report here (a) how the ensemble forecasts supported public health responses; (b) how well the ensemble forecast performed, relative to the forecasts produced by each contributing team; and (c) how we refined our reporting and visualisations to ensure that outputs were interpreted appropriately. Similar to COVID-19 forecasting studies in other countries, we found that the ensemble forecast consistently out-performed the individual model forecasts, and that performance was lowest when there were rapid changes in the epidemiology, such as periods around epidemic peaks. Our consortium’s internal peer-review process allowed us to explain how features of each ensemble forecast related to the design of the individual models, and this helped enable public health stakeholders to interpret the forecasts appropriately. Ultimately, our forecasts provided information that supported public health responses during periods of different policy goals, and over a wide range of epidemic scenarios.Author summary: In response to the emergence of COVID-19, governments around the world implemented a range of measures to reduce infections and deaths. In many countries, public health responses were guided by data analyses and by predictive forecasts of future cases, hospitalisations, and deaths. The authors were part of a consortium that was contracted by the Australian Government to produce forecasts of daily COVID-19 case counts for each of Australia’s eight states and territories from July 2020 to December 2023. Similar to COVID-19 forecasting studies in other countries, we found that combining forecasts from multiple models into an ensemble forecast consistently out-performed the individual models, and that performance was lowest when there were rapid changes in the epidemiology. We show here how these forecasts supported public health responses during periods of different policy goals, and over a wide range of epidemic scenarios.
Suggested Citation
Robert Moss & Ruarai J Tobin & Mitchell O’Hara-Wild & Adeshina I Adekunle & Dennis Liu & Tobin South & Dylan J Morris & Gerard E Ryan & Tianxiao Hao & Aarathy Babu & Katharine L Senior & James G Wood , 2026.
"Ensemble forecasts of COVID-19 activity to support Australia’s pandemic response: 2020–22,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 22(4), pages 1-22, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1014199
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014199
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1014199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.