Author
Listed:
- David Luis Schultheiss
- Zsolt Turi
- Joschka Boedecker
- Andreas Vlachos
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a widely used non-invasive brain stimulation technique in neuroscience research and clinical applications. TMS-based motor hotspot hunting describes the process of identifying the optimal scalp location to elicit robust and reliable motor responses. It is critical to ensure reproducibility of TMS parameters, as well as to determine safe and precise stimulation intensities in both healthy participants and patients. Typically, this process targets motor responses in contralateral short hand muscles. However, hotspot hunting remains challenging due to the vast parameter space and time constraints. To address this, we present an approach that concurrently optimizes both spatial and angular TMS parameters for hotspot hunting using Gaussian processes and Bayesian optimization. We systematically evaluated five state-of-the-art acquisition functions on electromyographic TMS data from eight healthy individuals enhanced by simulated data from generative models. Our results consistently demonstrate that optimizing spatial and angular TMS parameters simultaneously enhances the efficacy and spatial precision of hotspot hunting. Furthermore, we provide mechanistic insights into the acquisition function behavior and the impact of coil rotation constraints, revealing critical limitations in current hotspot-hunting strategies. Specifically, we show that arbitrary constraints on coil rotation angle are suboptimal, as they reduce flexibility and fail to account for individual variability. We further demonstrate that acquisition functions differ in sampling strategies and performance. Functions overly emphasizing exploitation tend to converge prematurely to local optima, whereas those balancing exploration and exploitation—particularly Thompson sampling—achieve superior performance. These findings highlight the importance of acquisition function selection and the necessity of removing restrictive coil rotation constraints for effective hotspot hunting. Our work advances TMS-based hotspot identification, potentially reducing participant burden and improving safety in both research and clinical applications beyond the motor cortex.Author summary: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive technique used to stimulate the human brain. It is widely applied in both neuroscience research and clinical practice. A key step in many TMS procedures is hotspot hunting, which involves finding the optimal spot on the scalp to produce muscle responses. This process is often slow and relies on manual adjustments of the stimulation settings. In this study, we developed a method that automatically optimizes the position and rotation of the TMS coil using advanced techniques such as Gaussian processes and Bayesian optimization. We tested our approach on data from healthy participants and supported it with realistic computer simulations. Our results show that our method improves both the speed and accuracy of hotspot detection. We also found that certain choices in the optimization process—especially how uncertainty is managed—have a strong effect on performance. In particular, we show that common restrictions on coil rotation can reduce effectiveness and should be reconsidered. This work provides a step toward making TMS faster, safer, and more reliable for both research and clinical use.
Suggested Citation
David Luis Schultheiss & Zsolt Turi & Joschka Boedecker & Andreas Vlachos, 2026.
"Efficient Gaussian process-based motor hotspot hunting with concurrent optimization of TMS coil location and orientation,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 22(2), pages 1-17, February.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1013994
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013994
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1013994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.