IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1013930.html

SHADE: A multilevel Bayesian framework for modeling directional spatial interactions in tissue microenvironments

Author

Listed:
  • Joel Eliason
  • Michele Peruzzi
  • Arvind Rao

Abstract

Motivation: Understanding how different cell types interact spatially within tissue microenvironments is critical for deciphering immune dynamics, tumor progression, and tissue organization. Many current spatial analysis methods assume symmetric associations or compute image-level summaries separately without sharing information across patients and cohorts, limiting biological interpretability and statistical power.Results: We present SHADE (Spatial Hierarchical Asymmetry via Directional Estimation), a multilevel Bayesian framework for modeling asymmetric spatial interactions across scales. SHADE quantifies direction-specific cell-cell associations using smooth spatial interaction curves (SICs) and integrates data across tissue sections, patients, and cohorts. Through simulation studies, SHADE demonstrates improved accuracy, robustness, and interpretability over existing methods. Application to colorectal cancer multiplexed imaging data demonstrates SHADE’s ability to quantify directional spatial patterns while controlling for tissue architecture confounders and capturing substantial patient-level heterogeneity. The framework successfully identifies biologically interpretable spatial organization patterns, revealing that local microenvironmental structure varies considerably across patients within molecular subtypes.Author summary: The spatial arrangement of cells within tumors provides critical insights into cancer progression and treatment response. Modern imaging technologies can map cellular neighborhoods across multiple tissue sections from many patients, but almost all existing statistical methods face at least one of two key limitations: they assume spatial relationships are symmetric (if immune cells cluster near tumor cells, tumor cells must cluster near immune cells), and/or they analyze each tissue section independently rather than pooling information across the biological hierarchy. We developed SHADE (Spatial Hierarchical Asymmetry via Directional Estimation) to address both challenges simultaneously. SHADE captures directional spatial dependencies, allowing asymmetric relationships between cell types, while operating within a multilevel Bayesian framework that borrows strength across tissue sections, patients, and patient groups. This hierarchical structure yields more precise estimates and directly quantifies variability at each biological scale. Applying SHADE to colorectal cancer data revealed distinct directional spatial patterns distinguishing immune-infiltrated from immune-excluded tumors, with substantial patient-level heterogeneity indicating diverse microenvironment architectures within disease subtypes. SHADE provides a principled approach for analyzing the directional, multi-scale organization of tissue microenvironments.

Suggested Citation

  • Joel Eliason & Michele Peruzzi & Arvind Rao, 2026. "SHADE: A multilevel Bayesian framework for modeling directional spatial interactions in tissue microenvironments," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 22(2), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1013930
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013930
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013930&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013930?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adrian Baddeley & Jean-François Coeurjolly & Ege Rubak & Rasmus Waagepetersen, 2014. "Logistic regression for spatial Gibbs point processes," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 101(2), pages 377-392.
    2. Baddeley, Adrian & Turner, Rolf, 2005. "spatstat: An R Package for Analyzing Spatial Point Patterns," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 12(i06).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicoletta D'Angelo, 2025. "Detecting Changes in Space‐Varying Parameters of Local Poisson Point Processes," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(5), July.
    2. Arii, Ken & Caspersen, John P. & Jones, Trevor A. & Thomas, Sean C., 2008. "A selection harvesting algorithm for use in spatially explicit individual-based forest simulation models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 251-266.
    3. Frank Davenport, 2017. "Estimating standard errors in spatial panel models with time varying spatial correlation," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96, pages 155-177, March.
    4. Leandro, Camila & Jay-Robert, Pierre & Mériguet, Bruno & Houard, Xavier & Renner, Ian W., 2020. "Is my sdm good enough? insights from a citizen science dataset in a point process modeling framework," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 438(C).
    5. Vijay Rajagopal & Gregory Bass & Cameron G Walker & David J Crossman & Amorita Petzer & Anthony Hickey & Ivo Siekmann & Masahiko Hoshijima & Mark H Ellisman & Edmund J Crampin & Christian Soeller, 2015. "Examination of the Effects of Heterogeneous Organization of RyR Clusters, Myofibrils and Mitochondria on Ca2+ Release Patterns in Cardiomyocytes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-31, September.
    6. Christoph Lambio & Tillman Schmitz & Richard Elson & Jeffrey Butler & Alexandra Roth & Silke Feller & Nicolai Savaskan & Tobia Lakes, 2023. "Exploring the Spatial Relative Risk of COVID-19 in Berlin-Neukölln," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-22, May.
    7. Abdollah Jalilian, 2017. "Modelling and classification of species abundance: a case study in the Barro Colorado Island plot," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(13), pages 2401-2409, October.
    8. Éric Marcon & Florence Puech, 2023. "Mapping distributions in non-homogeneous space with distance-based methods [Cartographie des distributions dans un espace non homogène à l'aide de méthodes basées sur la distance]," Post-Print hal-04345149, HAL.
    9. Eric Marcon & Florence Puech, 2012. "A typology of distance-based measures of spatial concentration," Working Papers halshs-00679993, HAL.
    10. Davies, Tilman M. & Jones, Khair & Hazelton, Martin L., 2016. "Symmetric adaptive smoothing regimens for estimation of the spatial relative risk function," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 12-28.
    11. Ondřej Šedivý & Antti Penttinen, 2014. "Intensity estimation for inhomogeneous Gibbs point process with covariates-dependent chemical activity," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 68(3), pages 225-249, August.
    12. Sillero, Neftalí & Campos, João Carlos & Arenas-Castro, Salvador & Barbosa, A.Márcia, 2023. "A curated list of R packages for ecological niche modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    13. Martín, Gerardo & Yáñez-Arenas, Carlos & Chiappa-Carrara, Xavier, 2022. "Discrepancies between point process models and environmental envelopes identify the niche centroid – geography configuration," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 469(C).
    14. Roger S. Bivand, 2021. "Progress in the R ecosystem for representing and handling spatial data," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 515-546, October.
    15. L. Altieri & D. Cocchi & M. Ventrucci, 2025. "Entropy‐Based Assessment of Biodiversity, With Application to Ants' Nests Data," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(1), January.
    16. Andrew J Edelman, 2012. "Positive Interactions between Desert Granivores: Localized Facilitation of Harvester Ants by Kangaroo Rats," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-9, February.
    17. Amanda S. Hering & Sean Bair, 2014. "Characterizing spatial and chronological target selection of serial offenders," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(1), pages 123-140, January.
    18. Nikhil Kaza & T. William Lester & Daniel A. Rodriguez, 2013. "The Spatio-temporal Clustering of Green Buildings in the United States," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(16), pages 3262-3282, December.
    19. Cory A. Toth & Todd E. Dennis & David E. Pattemore & Stuart Parsons, 2015. "Females as mobile resources: communal roosts promote the adoption of lek breeding in a temperate bat," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(4), pages 1156-1163.
    20. Tilman M. Davies & Martin L. Hazelton, 2013. "Assessing minimum contrast parameter estimation for spatial and spatiotemporal log‐Gaussian Cox processes," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 67(4), pages 355-389, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1013930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.