Author
Listed:
- Björn Vessman
- Pablo Guridi-Fernández
- Flor Inés Arias-Sánchez
- Sara Mitri
Abstract
There is increasing interest in artificially selecting or breeding microbial communities, but experiments have reported modest success. Here, we develop computational models to simulate two previously known selection methods and compare them to a new “disassembly” method. We evaluate all three methods in their ability to find a community that could efficiently degrade toxins, whereby investment into degradation results in slower growth. Our disassembly method relies on repeatedly competing different communities of known species combinations against one another, while regularly shuffling around their species combinations. This approach allows many species combinations to be explored, thereby maintaining enough between-community diversity for selection to act on, and resulting in communities with high performance. Nevertheless, selection at the community level in our simulations did not counteract selection at the individual level, nor the communities’ ecological dynamics. Species in our model evolved to invest less into community function and more into growth, but increased growth compensated for reduced investment, such that overall community performance was barely affected by within-species evolution. Within-community ecological dynamics were more of a challenge, as we could control them during the selection process, but community composition and function dropped in the longer term. Our work shows that the strength of disassembly lies mainly in its ability to explore different species combinations, and helps to propose alternative designs for community selection experiments.Author summary: Artificial selection has been extremely powerful in improving properties of complex biological or biochemical entities. The most familiar examples come from the breeding of animals and plants, but directed evolution has also been applied to increasing the efficacy of enzymes. Microbial communities are the promising next frontier for artificial selection, as they have the potential to overcome many human problems, from efficiently degrading plastic to increasing agricultural yield. Yet, breeding stable, well-functioning communities is hard: published selection experiments from the last decade have shown only minor improvements over naturally assembled communities. Before conducting more experiments, models can help to better understand the problems with artificially selecting communities and how to improve current approaches. Here, we develop mathematical models that show one reason why previous selection methods have been unsuccessful, propose a new selection method that overcomes this problem and analyze its strengths, weaknesses and experimental feasibility. The essence of the new method is to explore many different species combinations in a way that gradually improves community performance to ultimately find the best species combinations. According to our models, our new method is expected to outperform previous methods significantly.
Suggested Citation
Björn Vessman & Pablo Guridi-Fernández & Flor Inés Arias-Sánchez & Sara Mitri, 2026.
"Novel artificial selection method improves function of simulated microbial communities,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 22(1), pages 1-25, January.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1013863
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013863
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1013863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.