IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1013577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transmission thresholds for the spread of infections in healthcare facilities

Author

Listed:
  • Damon J A Toth
  • Karim Khader
  • Christopher Mitchell
  • Matthew H Samore

Abstract

Some infections may be sustained in the human population by persistent transmission among patients in healthcare facilities, including patients colonized with multi-drug-resistant organisms posing a major health threat. A nuanced understanding of facility characteristics that contribute to crossing a threshold for self-sustaining outbreak potential may be crucial to designing efficient interventions for lowering regional disease burden and preventing high-risk infections. Using a mathematical model, we define the facility basic reproduction number R0, where a single facility can sustain an outbreak without ongoing importation under the threshold condition R0 > 1. We define R0 for a general model with heterogeneous patient susceptibility and transmissibility and with generic length-of-stay assumptions, and we provide a software package for numerical calculation of user-defined examples. We estimate R0 using published data for carbapenemase–producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) in long-term acute-care hospitals (LTACHs) and the effects of interventions on R0, including surveillance, pathogen reduction treatments, and length-of-stay reduction. In a simple model, R0 is directly proportional to the sum of the mean and variance-to-mean ratio of the length-of-stay distribution. In intervention models, R0 depends on the moment-generating function of the length-of-stay distribution. From the CPE data, we estimated R0 = 1.24 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.45) prior to intervention. Weekly surveillance with 50% transmission reduction of detected patients alone could have reduced R0 to 0.85 (0.72, 0.98), with additional reduction if detected patients could be decolonized. Reducing the mean length of stay does not necessarily reduce R0 if the variance-to-mean ratio is not also reduced. We conclude that R0 > 1 conditions plausibly exist in LTACHs, where CPE outbreaks could be sustained by patients who acquire colonization and subsequently transmit to other patients during the same hospital stay. Our findings illuminate epidemiological mechanisms producing those conditions and their relationship to interventions that could efficiently improve population health.Author summary: The spread of infectious diseases between patients admitted to the same healthcare facility can cause large outbreaks of dangerous organisms such as bacteria resistant to available antibiotic treatments. One way to quantify facility transmission is with the basic reproduction number, R0. When a facility patient acquires the organism, R0 is the average number of onward transmissions from that patient, when all other patients are susceptible. There is an important threshold effect at R0=1: when R0 1, a continual chain of transmissions stemming from one introduction is possible. We provide a novel formula for R0 specific to healthcare facilities and exhibiting this threshold effect. We show that R0>1 likely occurred in facilities with high rates of drug-resistant bacterial infections, and we provide nuanced insights into intervention efforts to push R0

Suggested Citation

  • Damon J A Toth & Karim Khader & Christopher Mitchell & Matthew H Samore, 2025. "Transmission thresholds for the spread of infections in healthcare facilities," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-23, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1013577
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013577
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013577&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013577?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1013577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.