IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1013554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on computational biology early career researchers: A global retrospective study

Author

Listed:
  • Pradeep Eranti
  • Megha Hegde
  • Syed Muktadir Al Sium
  • R Gonzalo Parra
  • Alastair M Kilpatrick
  • Sayane Shome
  • Farzana Rahman

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic led to devastating physical, psychological, and financial impacts on millions of people across the world. Amidst a rapidly evolving research landscape, the global scientific community was forced to swiftly adapt to novel working methods, including remote collaboration tools, virtual conferences, and online research platforms. Surveys of life sciences researchers have indicated that computational biologists experienced less disruption and a smoother transition to remote working than experimental biologists, due to their reduced reliance on laboratory equipment. Despite this adaptability, the sudden shift to remote work, compounded by stress and social isolation, has posed significant mental health challenges for these workers. However, remote work has also facilitated opportunities for more flexible work arrangements and increased collaboration across geographical boundaries. To investigate these impacts, we conducted surveys of computational biologists during the Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology (ISMB) conferences in 2020 and 2021, which were held virtually due to the COVID-19 lockdowns. This study implements a thorough statistical analysis of the survey results to offer insights into the repercussions of the lockdowns on researchers and their work. Key areas of investigation include the effects of institutional support (or lack thereof), the difference in productivity compared to pre-lockdown levels, and the significance of gender in determining these impacts. Notably, a lack of institutional support with regard to mental health and finances was shown to have a significant negative effect on early-career researchers. Although limited by a small sample size, our study sets the stage for a more robust exploration of these trends in future research. Importantly, by illuminating the challenges and opportunities arising from the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdowns, our study offers hope for potential solutions supporting the well-being of early-career researchers in unprecedented circumstances.

Suggested Citation

  • Pradeep Eranti & Megha Hegde & Syed Muktadir Al Sium & R Gonzalo Parra & Alastair M Kilpatrick & Sayane Shome & Farzana Rahman, 2025. "Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on computational biology early career researchers: A global retrospective study," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1013554
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013554
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013554&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013554?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Etheridge, Ben & Wang, Yikai & Tang, Li, 2020. "Worker productivity during lockdown and working from home: evidence from self-reports," ISER Working Paper Series 2020-12, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sangeeta Gupta & Poonam Devdutt & Urmila Jagadeeswari Itam, 2022. "Centrality of psychological well-being of IT employees during COVID-19 and beyond," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 49(4), pages 365-380, December.
    2. Vij, Akshay & Souza, Flavio F. & Barrie, Helen & Anilan, V. & Sarmiento, Sergio & Washington, Lynette, 2023. "Employee preferences for working from home in Australia," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 782-800.
    3. Masayuki Morikawa, 2023. "Productivity dynamics of remote work during the COVID‐19 pandemic," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(3), pages 317-331, July.
    4. Stefanie Stantcheva, 2022. "Inequalities in the times of a pandemic," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 37(109), pages 5-41.
    5. Janice C. dup Eberly & John dup Fernald, 2022. "Jackson Hole 2022 - Reassessing Economic Constraints: Potential Output (The Impact of COVID on Productivity and Potential Output)," Proceedings - Economic Policy Symposium - Jackson Hole, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, August.
    6. Christian Kagerl & Julia Starzetz, 2023. "Working from home for good? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and what this means for the future of work," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 229-265, January.
    7. Behrens, Kristian & Kichko, Sergei & Thisse, Jacques-Francois, 2024. "Working from home: Too much of a good thing?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    8. Kai Fischer & J. James Reade & W. Benedikt Schmal, 2021. "The Long Shadow of an Infection: COVID-19 and Performance at Work," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2021-17, Department of Economics, University of Reading.
    9. Mung Khie Tsen & Manli Gu & Chee Meng Tan & See Kwong Goh, 2023. "Homeworking and Employee Job Stress and Work Engagement: A Multilevel Analysis from 34 European Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 511-538, August.
    10. Jun Hyung Kim & Yu Kyung Koh & Jinseong Park, 2023. "Mental Health Consequences of Working from Home during the Pandemic," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(1), pages 18-50, January.
    11. Gilles Duranton & Jessie Handbury, 2023. "COVID and Cities, Thus Far," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 29(2), pages 6-52, October.
    12. Franziska Foissner, 2021. "Literaturüberblick zu österreichischen und internationalen Umfragen zu Corona und Arbeitsbedingungen," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 221, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.
    13. Julia Baumann & Anastasia Danilov & Olga Stavrova, 2023. "Self-control and performance while working from home," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-19, April.
    14. Michael Gibbs & Friederike Mengel & Christoph Siemroth, 2023. "Work from Home and Productivity: Evidence from Personnel and Analytics Data on Information Technology Professionals," Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(1), pages 7-41.
    15. Morikawa, Masayuki, 2021. "Work-from-Home Productivity during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Surveys of Employees and Employers," SSPJ Discussion Paper Series DP20-007, Service Sector Productivity in Japan: Determinants and Policies, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    16. Esme Işık & Ayfer Özyılmaz & Metin Toprak & Yüksel Bayraktar & Figen Büyükakın & Mehmet Fırat Olgun, 2022. "Will Outbreaks Increase or Reduce Income Inequality? the Case of COVID-19," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 51(2), pages 583-605, November.
    17. Hensher, David A. & Balbontin, Camila & Beck, Matthew J. & Wei, Edward, 2024. "Commuting mode choice and work from home in the later stages of COVID-19: Consolidating a future focussed prediction tool to inform transport and land use planning," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    18. Nicholas Bloom & Ruobing Han & James Liang, 2022. "How hybrid working from home works out," POID Working Papers 059, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    19. Deole, Sumit S. & Deter, Max & Huang, Yue, 2023. "Home sweet home: Working from home and employee performance during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    20. Burdett, Ashley & Etheridge, Ben & Tang, Li & Wang, Yikai, 2024. "Worker productivity during Covid-19 and adaptation to working from home," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1013554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.