IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1013444.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Action subsampling supports policy compression in large action spaces

Author

Listed:
  • Shuze Liu
  • Samuel Joseph Gershman

Abstract

Real-world decision-making often involves navigating large action spaces with state-dependent action values, taxing the limited cognitive resources at our disposal. While previous studies have explored cognitive constraints on generating action consideration sets or refining state-action mappings (policy complexity), their interplay remains underexplored. In this work, we present a resource-rational framework for policy compression that integrates both constraints, offering a unified perspective on decision-making under cognitive limitations. Through simulations, we characterize the suboptimality arising from reduced action consideration sets and reveal the complex interaction between policy complexity and action consideration set size in mitigating this suboptimality. We then use such normative insight to explain empirically observed phenomena in option generation, including the preferential sampling of generally valuable options and increased correlation in responses across contexts under cognitive load. We further validate the framework’s predictions through a contextual multi-armed bandit experiment, showing how humans flexibly adapt their action consideration sets and policy complexity to maintain near-optimality in a task-dependent manner. Our study demonstrates the importance of accounting for fine-grained resource constraints in understanding human cognition, and highlights the presence of adaptive metacognitive strategies even in simple tasks.Author summary: This study provides insight into how humans navigate the dual problem of deciding which actions to consider, and which actions to perform in particular contexts. It rationalizes previously observed tendencies of humans to sample generally valuable actions, explores the implication of changing either component of the dual problem on the reward yielded, and demonstrates the framework’s relevance through a human experiment. The study suggests that even in simple tasks, humans may still spontaneously simplify the original task to reduce their cognitive load.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuze Liu & Samuel Joseph Gershman, 2025. "Action subsampling supports policy compression in large action spaces," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-27, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1013444
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013444
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013444&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013444?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1013444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.