IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1013415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Age polyethism can emerge from social learning: A game-theoretic investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Moein Khajehnejad
  • Julian García
  • Bernd Meyer

Abstract

Age-polyethism—the age-based allocation of tasks in social insect colonies—is a key feature of division of labour. While its hormonal underpinnings have been studied extensively, the behavioural and environmental mechanisms driving age-polyethism remain poorly understood, especially under ecological stress. We present a novel modelling framework that integrates social learning with task-related environmental feedback to explain the emergence and breakdown of age-polyethism. We develop two models: a Social Learning (SL) model, in which individuals adapt task preferences by copying similar peers, and a Stimulus-Response Threshold Social Learning (SRT-SL) model, which extends this framework by incorporating task-related dynamic stimuli and response thresholds that regulate collective task demand. Our models demonstrate that age-polyethism can emerge from simple social imitation processes, without the need for fixed hormonal schedules. We show that under increasing environmental pressure (e.g., resource scarcity), age-polyethism collapses as younger individuals are forced into tasks typically handled by older workers. Importantly, we find that age-polyethism does not necessarily optimize immediate colony efficiency; instead, it appears to reflect a trade-off between environmental constraints and behavioural coordination. These findings provide a mechanistic and ecologically grounded explanation for empirical observations linking environmental stress to dysfunctional division of labour and colony collapse.Author summary: In many social insect colonies, like those of bees, workers perform different task sets at different ages (age polyethism). Commonly, younger individuals perform safe tasks inside the nest while older ones take on risky jobs like foraging. This age-based division of labour is often attributed to internal hormonal schedules, but how social behaviour and environmental stress affect this system is poorly understood. We developed a computer model to investigate these factors. In our model, individuals learn which tasks to perform by imitating other workers, paying more attention to their age peers. We then introduced environmental pressures to see how the self-organised division of labour would adjust. Our model shows that this simple form of social learning is enough for an age-based workforce structure to emerge that still maintains flexibility, without the requirement for a rigid internal clock. Crucially, when we applied strong environmental stress, this system collapsed and younger workers were forced into dangerous foraging tasks prematurely, which is consistent with empirical results. We also found that this division of labour may not be about maximizing day-to-day efficiency, but rather about ensuring long-term colony stability and resilience. These findings provide a new, mechanistic explanation for age polyethism and how environmental pressures can disrupt the social organization of a colony, offering key insights into the real-world problem of colony collapse.

Suggested Citation

  • Moein Khajehnejad & Julian García & Bernd Meyer, 2025. "Age polyethism can emerge from social learning: A game-theoretic investigation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-22, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1013415
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013415
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013415&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013415?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1013415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.