Author
Listed:
- Micha Heilbron
- Floris P de Lange
Abstract
Theories of predictive processing propose that sensory systems constantly predict incoming signals, based on spatial and temporal context. However, evidence for prediction in sensory cortex largely comes from artificial experiments using simple, highly predictable stimuli, that arguably encourage prediction. Here, we test for sensory prediction during natural scene perception. Specifically, we use deep generative modelling to quantify the spatial predictability of receptive field (RF) patches in natural images, and compared those predictability estimates to brain responses in the mouse visual cortex—while rigorously accounting for established tuning to a rich set of low-level image features and their local statistical context—in a large scale survey of high-density recordings from the Allen Institute Brain Observatory. This revealed four insights. First, cortical responses across the mouse visual system are shaped by sensory predictability, with more predictable image patches evoking weaker responses. Secondly, visual cortical neurons are primarily sensitive to the predictability of higher-level image features, even in neurons in the primary visual areas that are preferentially tuned to low-level visual features. Third, unpredictability sensitivity is stronger in the superficial layers of primary visual cortex, in line with predictive coding models. Finally, these spatial prediction effects are independent of recent experience, suggesting that they rely on long-term priors about the structure of the visual world. Together, these results suggest visual cortex might predominantly predict sensory information at higher levels of abstraction—a pattern bearing striking similarities to recent, successful techniques from artificial intelligence for predictive self-supervised learning.Author summary: How does the brain make sense of the constant stream of visual information? A popular theory suggests the brain is not a passive receiver but an active predictor, constantly generating predictions about incoming sensory input. We tested this idea by analysing neural responses of thousands of brain cells of mice watching natural images. Using an AI model, we could quantify how predictable any specific image patch was given its surroundings. As predicted by the theory, we found that the brain cells indeed responded less to more predictable parts of an image. This effect appears based on long-term knowledge, as it was independent of the animal’s recent experience with the images. Strikingly, we discovered that even in the earliest stages of visual processing, the brain is most sensitive to the predictability of complex patterns and textures, not that of simple features like edges. This strategy of predicting specifically the complex (high-level) information mirrors recent breakthroughs in AI, suggesting that both brains and these recent AI systems may learn to understand the visual world through a similar, predictive process.
Suggested Citation
Micha Heilbron & Floris P de Lange, 2026.
"Higher-level spatial prediction in natural vision across mouse visual cortex,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 22(1), pages 1-21, January.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1013136
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013136
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1013136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.