IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1012695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimisation strategies for directed evolution without sequencing

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica James
  • Sebastian Towers
  • Jakob Foerster
  • Harrison Steel

Abstract

Directed evolution can enable engineering of biological systems with minimal knowledge of their underlying sequence-to-function relationships. A typical directed evolution process consists of iterative rounds of mutagenesis and selection that are designed to steer changes in a biological system (e.g. a protein) towards some functional goal. Much work has been done, particularly leveraging advancements in machine learning, to optimise the process of directed evolution. Many of these methods, however, require DNA sequencing and synthesis, making them resource-intensive and incompatible with developments in targeted in vivo mutagenesis. Operating within the experimental constraints of established sorting-based directed evolution techniques (e.g. Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting, FACS), we explore approaches for optimisation of directed evolution that could in future be implemented without sequencing information. We then expand our methods to the context of emerging experimental techniques in directed evolution, which allow for single-cell selection based on fitness objectives defined from any combination of measurable traits. Finally, we explore these alternative strategies on the GB1 and TrpB empirical landscapes, demonstrating that they could lead to up to 19-fold and 7-fold increases respectively in the probability of attaining the global fitness peak.Author summary: The standard approach to sorting-based selection in directed evolution is to take forward only the top-performing variants from each generation of a single population. There are, however, many possible approaches to exploring non-convex evolutionary fitness landscapes, and choosing this strategy as default may not always be the strongest approach. In this work, we begin to explore alternative selection strategies within a simulated directed evolution framework. We propose “selection functions”, which allow us to tune the balance of exploration and exploitation of a fitness landscape, and we demonstrate that splitting a population into sub-populations can improve both the likelihood and magnitude of a successful outcome. We also propose strategies to leverage emerging selection methods that can implement single-cell selection based on any combination of measurable traits. We finally assess the space of alternative directed evolution strategies on the empirical fitness landscapes of the GB1 immunoglobulin protein and of TrpB tryptophan synthase. Our resulting proposal is that researchers should consider moving away from the standard approach, which we find to be generally sub-optimal, and implement population splitting to improve experiments. With improved knowledge from fitness landscape inference, directed evolution strategies could be further tailored using the tools proposed here.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica James & Sebastian Towers & Jakob Foerster & Harrison Steel, 2024. "Optimisation strategies for directed evolution without sequencing," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012695
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012695
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012695&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012695?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.