Author
Listed:
- Solène Song
- Paul Villoutreix
Abstract
Development is a complex process driven by coordinated cell proliferation, differentiation, and spatial organization. Classically, two ways to specify cell types during development have been hypothesized: the mosaic and regulative modes. In the mosaic mode, a particular cell isolated from the rest of the embryo will still give rise to progeny with the same fate as expected in normal development, relying on lineage-inherited factors. In contrast, in the regulative mode, the fate of a cell depends on its interactions with its environment and thus relies on space-dependent factors. While both modes often co-exist, their relative contributions remain poorly quantified at single-cell resolution. We present a novel approach to measure these contributions from single-cell data from C. elegans development. The invariant lineage of C. elegans allows the integration of spatial positions, lineage relationships, and protein expression data. Using single-cell protein expression profiles as a readout of cell state, we define two quantifiable metrics: 1) a proxy for the contribution of the mosaic mode, computed as the strength of the relationship between the cell-cell lineage distance and the cell-cell expression distance, 2) a proxy for the contribution of the regulative mode, computed as the strength of the relationship between the cell-cell context distance – capturing spatial neighborhood similarity - and the cell-cell expression distance. To validate these metrics, we compared empirical results from C. elegans to artificial models with defined developmental rules. Our analysis reveals the coexistence of mosaic and regulative modes, with their relative contributions varying across tissues and developmental stages. For example, in skin tissue, the mosaic mode dominates in early development, while the regulative mode prevails later. Our approach offers a quantitative, unbiased, and perturbation-free method to study fundamental principles of developmental biology.Author summary: Understanding how a single cell is transformed into an organism composed of a multitude of cells with precise functions and positions requires understanding how cells choose their fates. Two main mechanisms are usually assumed: the mosaic mode and the regulative mode. In the mosaic mode, the fate of a cell is predetermined by inherited factors. Meanwhile, in the regulative mode, the fate of a cell depends on signals from its surroundings. We used the nematode C. elegans, a model organism with a well-mapped development, to propose a way to assess the respective contributions of these modes. By analyzing individual cells, their positions, lineage relationships, and protein patterns, we developed two measures to quantify these contributions. One measure shows how much cell fate depends on inheritance (mosaic), while the other captures the impact of neighboring cells (regulative). Our findings show that both modes coexist, but their importance shifts over time and between tissues. For example, early skin development is more mosaic, while later stages rely on regulative processes. This method gives us a new and precise way to study how organisms build themselves without disrupting the process through experimental perturbations.
Suggested Citation
Solène Song & Paul Villoutreix, 2025.
"Assessing the relative contributions of mosaic and regulatory developmental modes from single-cell trajectories,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(12), pages 1-19, December.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012352
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012352
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.