Author
Listed:
- Milena Rmus
- Ti-Fen Pan
- Liyu Xia
- Anne G E Collins
Abstract
Computational cognitive models have been used extensively to formalize cognitive processes. Model parameters offer a simple way to quantify individual differences in how humans process information. Similarly, model comparison allows researchers to identify which theories, embedded in different models, provide the best accounts of the data. Cognitive modeling uses statistical tools to quantitatively relate models to data that often rely on computing/estimating the likelihood of the data under the model. However, this likelihood is computationally intractable for a substantial number of models. These relevant models may embody reasonable theories of cognition, but are often under-explored due to the limited range of tools available to relate them to data. We contribute to filling this gap in a simple way using artificial neural networks (ANNs) to map data directly onto model identity and parameters, bypassing the likelihood estimation. We test our instantiation of an ANN as a cognitive model fitting tool on classes of cognitive models with strong inter-trial dependencies (such as reinforcement learning models), which offer unique challenges to most methods. We show that we can adequately perform both parameter estimation and model identification using our ANN approach, including for models that cannot be fit using traditional likelihood-based methods. We further discuss our work in the context of the ongoing research leveraging simulation-based approaches to parameter estimation and model identification, and how these approaches broaden the class of cognitive models researchers can quantitatively investigate.Author summary: Computational cognitive models occupy an important position in cognitive science research, as they offer a simple way of quantifying cognitive processes (such as how fast someone learns, or how noisy they are in choice selection), and testing which cognitive theories offer a better explanation of the behavior. To relate cognitive models to the behavioral data, researchers rely on statistical tools that require estimating the likelihood of observed data under the assumptions of the cognitive model. This is, however, not possible to do for all models as some models present significant challenges to likelihood computation. In this work, we use artificial neural networks (ANNs) to bypass likelihood computation and approximation altogether, and demonstrate the success of this approach applied to model parameter estimation and model comparison. The proposed method is a contribution to ongoing development of modeling tools which will enable cognitive researchers to test a broader range of theories of cognition.
Suggested Citation
Milena Rmus & Ti-Fen Pan & Liyu Xia & Anne G E Collins, 2024.
"Artificial neural networks for model identification and parameter estimation in computational cognitive models,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-33, May.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012119
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012119
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.