IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1012041.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Burr distribution as a model for the delay between key events in an individual’s infection history

Author

Listed:
  • Nyall Jamieson
  • Christiana Charalambous
  • David M Schultz
  • Ian Hall

Abstract

Understanding the temporal relationship between key events in an individual’s infection history is crucial for disease control. Delay data between events, such as infection and symptom onset times, is doubly censored because the exact time at which these key events occur is generally unknown. Current mathematical models for delay distributions are derived from heuristic justifications. Here, we derive a new model for delay distributions, specifically for incubation periods, motivated by bacterial-growth dynamics that lead to the Burr family of distributions being a valid modelling choice. We also incorporate methods within these models to account for the doubly censored data. Our approach provides biological justification in the derivation of our delay distribution model, the results of fitting to data highlighting the superiority of the Burr model compared to currently used models when the mode of the distribution is clearly defined or when the distribution tapers off. Under these conditions, our results indicate that the derived Burr distribution is a better-performing model for incubation-period data than currently used methods, with the derived Burr distribution being 13 times more likely to be a better-performing model than the gamma distribution for Legionnaires’ disease based on data from a known outbreak.Author summary: In public health, it is important to know key temporal properties of diseases (such as how long someone is ill for or infectious for). Mathematical characterisation of properties requires information about patients’ infection histories, such as the number of days between infection and symptom onset. These methods provide useful insights, such as how their infectiousness varies over time since they were infected. However, two key issues arise with these approaches. First, these methods do not have strong arguments for the validity of their usage. Second, the data typically used is provided as a rounded number of days between key events, as opposed to the exact period of time. We address both these issues by developing a new mathematical model to describe the important properties of the infection process of various diseases based on strong biological justification, and further incorporating methods within the mathematical model which consider infection and symptom onset to occur at any point within an interval, as opposed to an exact time. Under certain conditions, our approach provides more preferable results, based on AIC, than existing approaches, enhancing the understanding of properties of diseases such as Legionnaires’ disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Nyall Jamieson & Christiana Charalambous & David M Schultz & Ian Hall, 2024. "The Burr distribution as a model for the delay between key events in an individual’s infection history," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-22, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012041
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012041
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012041&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.