IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1011959.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knotted artifacts in predicted 3D RNA structures

Author

Listed:
  • Bartosz A Gren
  • Maciej Antczak
  • Tomasz Zok
  • Joanna I Sulkowska
  • Marta Szachniuk

Abstract

Unlike proteins, RNAs deposited in the Protein Data Bank do not contain topological knots. Recently, admittedly, the first trefoil knot and some lasso-type conformations have been found in experimental RNA structures, but these are still exceptional cases. Meanwhile, algorithms predicting 3D RNA models have happened to form knotted structures not so rarely. Interestingly, machine learning-based predictors seem to be more prone to generate knotted RNA folds than traditional methods. A similar situation is observed for the entanglements of structural elements. In this paper, we analyze all models submitted to the CASP15 competition in the 3D RNA structure prediction category. We show what types of topological knots and structure element entanglements appear in the submitted models and highlight what methods are behind the generation of such conformations. We also study the structural aspect of susceptibility to entanglement. We suggest that predictors take care of an evaluation of RNA models to avoid publishing structures with artifacts, such as unusual entanglements, that result from hallucinations of predictive algorithms.Author summary: 3D RNA structure prediction contests such as CASP and RNA-Puzzles lack measures for topology-wise evaluation of predicted models. Thus, predictors happen to submit potentially inappropriate conformations, for example, containing entanglements that are prediction artifacts.Automated identification of entanglements in 3D RNA structures is computationally hard. Distinguishing correct from incorrectly entangled conformations is not trivial and often requires expert knowledge.We analyzed 3D RNA models submitted to CASP15 and found that all entanglements in these models are artifacts.Compared to non-ML, machine learning-based methods are more prone to generating entanglements that are not present in natural RNAs.To increase the reliability of 3D RNA structure prediction, it is necessary to reject abnormally entangled structures in the modeling stage.

Suggested Citation

  • Bartosz A Gren & Maciej Antczak & Tomasz Zok & Joanna I Sulkowska & Marta Szachniuk, 2024. "Knotted artifacts in predicted 3D RNA structures," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011959
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011959
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011959&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011959?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.