IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1011896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shared input and recurrency in neural networks for metabolically efficient information transmission

Author

Listed:
  • Tomas Barta
  • Lubomir Kostal

Abstract

Shared input to a population of neurons induces noise correlations, which can decrease the information carried by a population activity. Inhibitory feedback in recurrent neural networks can reduce the noise correlations and thus increase the information carried by the population activity. However, the activity of inhibitory neurons is costly. This inhibitory feedback decreases the gain of the population. Thus, depolarization of its neurons requires stronger excitatory synaptic input, which is associated with higher ATP consumption. Given that the goal of neural populations is to transmit as much information as possible at minimal metabolic costs, it is unclear whether the increased information transmission reliability provided by inhibitory feedback compensates for the additional costs. We analyze this problem in a network of leaky integrate-and-fire neurons receiving correlated input. By maximizing mutual information with metabolic cost constraints, we show that there is an optimal strength of recurrent connections in the network, which maximizes the value of mutual information-per-cost. For higher values of input correlation, the mutual information-per-cost is higher for recurrent networks with inhibitory feedback compared to feedforward networks without any inhibitory neurons. Our results, therefore, show that the optimal synaptic strength of a recurrent network can be inferred from metabolically efficient coding arguments and that decorrelation of the input by inhibitory feedback compensates for the associated increased metabolic costs.Author summary: Information processing in neurons is mediated by electrical activity through ionic currents. To reach homeostasis, neurons must actively work to reverse these ionic currents. This process consumes energy in the form of ATP. Typically the more energy the neuron can use, the more information it can transmit. It is generally assumed that due to evolutionary pressures, neurons evolved to process and transmit information efficiently at high rates but also at low costs. Many studies have addressed this balance between transmitted information and metabolic costs for the activity of single neurons. However, information is often carried by the activity of a population of neurons instead of single neurons, and few studies investigated this balance in the context of recurrent neural networks, which can be found in the cortex. In such networks, the external input from thalamocortical synapses introduces pairwise correlations between the neurons, complicating the information transmission. These correlations can be reduced by inhibitory feedback through recurrent connections between inhibitory and excitatory neurons in the network. However, such activity increases the metabolic cost of the activity of the network. By analyzing the balance between decorrelation through inhibitory feedback and correlation through shared input from the thalamus, we find that both the shared input and inhibitory feedback can help increase the information-metabolic efficiency of the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomas Barta & Lubomir Kostal, 2024. "Shared input and recurrency in neural networks for metabolically efficient information transmission," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-23, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011896
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011896
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011896&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011896?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.