IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1011445.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rapid runtime learning by curating small datasets of high-quality items obtained from memory

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Scott German
  • Guofeng Cui
  • Chenliang Xu
  • Robert A Jacobs

Abstract

We propose the “runtime learning” hypothesis which states that people quickly learn to perform unfamiliar tasks as the tasks arise by using task-relevant instances of concepts stored in memory during mental training. To make learning rapid, the hypothesis claims that only a few class instances are used, but these instances are especially valuable for training. The paper motivates the hypothesis by describing related ideas from the cognitive science and machine learning literatures. Using computer simulation, we show that deep neural networks (DNNs) can learn effectively from small, curated training sets, and that valuable training items tend to lie toward the centers of data item clusters in an abstract feature space. In a series of three behavioral experiments, we show that people can also learn effectively from small, curated training sets. Critically, we find that participant reaction times and fitted drift rates are best accounted for by the confidences of DNNs trained on small datasets of highly valuable items. We conclude that the runtime learning hypothesis is a novel conjecture about the relationship between learning and memory with the potential for explaining a wide variety of cognitive phenomena.Author summary: Human cognition is remarkably flexible, with the ability to reliably perform a wide variety of tasks, including idiosyncratic and unfamiliar ones, in a wide variety of contexts. However, despite impressive advances in machine learning, leading to artificial intelligences capable of outperforming humans on select individual tasks, this flexibility has yet to be replicated by computational models. Doing so is essential to both creating general artificial intelligence and to achieving a deeper understanding of the human brain and mind. To account for this vital property of human cognition, we introduce the “runtime learning hypothesis”, in which the brain rapidly constructs task-specific models in response to the needs of the moment using an internal training process based on valuable exemplars of the relevant concepts. We examine the plausibility of this hypothesis using human behavioral experiments and machine-learning-based computational modeling. The results are consistent with the human brain using runtime learning to flexibly perform tasks.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Scott German & Guofeng Cui & Chenliang Xu & Robert A Jacobs, 2023. "Rapid runtime learning by curating small datasets of high-quality items obtained from memory," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-32, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011445
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011445
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011445
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011445&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011445?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruairidh M. Battleday & Joshua C. Peterson & Thomas L. Griffiths, 2020. "Capturing human categorization of natural images by combining deep networks and cognitive models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mélanie Bernhardt & Daniel C. Castro & Ryutaro Tanno & Anton Schwaighofer & Kerem C. Tezcan & Miguel Monteiro & Shruthi Bannur & Matthew P. Lungren & Aditya Nori & Ben Glocker & Javier Alvarez-Valle &, 2022. "Active label cleaning for improved dataset quality under resource constraints," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Song Tong & Kai Mao & Zhen Huang & Yukun Zhao & Kaiping Peng, 2024. "Automating psychological hypothesis generation with AI: when large language models meet causal graph," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Bria Long & Judith E. Fan & Holly Huey & Zixian Chai & Michael C. Frank, 2024. "Parallel developmental changes in children’s production and recognition of line drawings of visual concepts," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.