IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1011108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methods and considerations for estimating parameters in biophysically detailed neural models with simulation based inference

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas Tolley
  • Pedro L C Rodrigues
  • Alexandre Gramfort
  • Stephanie R Jones

Abstract

Biophysically detailed neural models are a powerful technique to study neural dynamics in health and disease with a growing number of established and openly available models. A major challenge in the use of such models is that parameter inference is an inherently difficult and unsolved problem. Identifying unique parameter distributions that can account for observed neural dynamics, and differences across experimental conditions, is essential to their meaningful use. Recently, simulation based inference (SBI) has been proposed as an approach to perform Bayesian inference to estimate parameters in detailed neural models. SBI overcomes the challenge of not having access to a likelihood function, which has severely limited inference methods in such models, by leveraging advances in deep learning to perform density estimation. While the substantial methodological advancements offered by SBI are promising, their use in large scale biophysically detailed models is challenging and methods for doing so have not been established, particularly when inferring parameters that can account for time series waveforms. We provide guidelines and considerations on how SBI can be applied to estimate time series waveforms in biophysically detailed neural models starting with a simplified example and extending to specific applications to common MEG/EEG waveforms using the the large scale neural modeling framework of the Human Neocortical Neurosolver. Specifically, we describe how to estimate and compare results from example oscillatory and event related potential simulations. We also describe how diagnostics can be used to assess the quality and uniqueness of the posterior estimates. The methods described provide a principled foundation to guide future applications of SBI in a wide variety of applications that use detailed models to study neural dynamics.Author summary: A central problem in computational neural modeling is estimating model parameters that can account for observed activity patterns. While several techniques exist to perform parameter inference in special classes of abstract neural models, there are comparatively few approaches for large scale biophysically detailed neural models. In this work, we describe challenges and solutions in applying a deep learning based statistical framework to estimate parameters in a biophysically detailed large scale neural model, and emphasize the particular difficulties in estimating parameters for time series data. Our example uses a multi-scale model designed to connect human MEG/EEG recordings to the underlying cell and circuit level generators. Our approach allows for crucial insight into how cell-level properties interact to produce measured neural activity, and provides guidelines for diagnosing the quality of the estimate and uniqueness of predictions for different MEG/EEG biomarkers.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas Tolley & Pedro L C Rodrigues & Alexandre Gramfort & Stephanie R Jones, 2024. "Methods and considerations for estimating parameters in biophysically detailed neural models with simulation based inference," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-29, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011108
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011108
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011108&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.