Author
Listed:
- Kai J Miller
- Klaus-Robert Müller
- Gabriela Ojeda Valencia
- Harvey Huang
- Nicholas M Gregg
- Gregory A Worrell
- Dora Hermes
Abstract
Single-pulse electrical stimulation in the nervous system, often called cortico-cortical evoked potential (CCEP) measurement, is an important technique to understand how brain regions interact with one another. Voltages are measured from implanted electrodes in one brain area while stimulating another with brief current impulses separated by several seconds. Historically, researchers have tried to understand the significance of evoked voltage polyphasic deflections by visual inspection, but no general-purpose tool has emerged to understand their shapes or describe them mathematically. We describe and illustrate a new technique to parameterize brain stimulation data, where voltage response traces are projected into one another using a semi-normalized dot product. The length of timepoints from stimulation included in the dot product is varied to obtain a temporal profile of structural significance, and the peak of the profile uniquely identifies the duration of the response. Using linear kernel PCA, a canonical response shape is obtained over this duration, and then single-trial traces are parameterized as a projection of this canonical shape with a residual term. Such parameterization allows for dissimilar trace shapes from different brain areas to be directly compared by quantifying cross-projection magnitudes, response duration, canonical shape projection amplitudes, signal-to-noise ratios, explained variance, and statistical significance. Artifactual trials are automatically identified by outliers in sub-distributions of cross-projection magnitude, and rejected. This technique, which we call “Canonical Response Parameterization” (CRP) dramatically simplifies the study of CCEP shapes, and may also be applied in a wide range of other settings involving event-triggered data.Author summary: We introduce a new machine learning technique for quantifying the structure of responses to single-pulse intracranial electrical brain stimulation. This approach allows voltage response traces of very different shape to be compared with one another. A tool like this has been needed to replace the status quo, where researchers may understand their data in terms of discovered structure rather than in terms of a pre-assigned, hand-picked, feature. The method compares single-trial responses pairwise to understand if there is a reproducible shape and how long it lasts. When significant structure is identified, the shape underlying it is isolated and each trial is parameterized in terms of this shape. This simple parameterization enables quantification of statistical significance, signal-to-noise ratio, explained variance, and average voltage of the response. Differently-shaped voltage traces from any setting can be compared with any other in a succinct mathematical framework. This versatile tool to quantify single-pulse stimulation data should facilitate a blossoming in the study of brain connectivity using implanted electrodes.
Suggested Citation
Kai J Miller & Klaus-Robert Müller & Gabriela Ojeda Valencia & Harvey Huang & Nicholas M Gregg & Gregory A Worrell & Dora Hermes, 2023.
"Canonical Response Parameterization: Quantifying the structure of responses to single-pulse intracranial electrical brain stimulation,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-25, May.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011105
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011105
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.