IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1011059.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying cooperative multisite binding in the hub protein LC8 through Bayesian inference

Author

Listed:
  • Aidan B Estelle
  • August George
  • Elisar J Barbar
  • Daniel M Zuckerman

Abstract

Multistep protein-protein interactions underlie most biological processes, but their characterization through methods such as isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) is largely confined to simple models that provide little information on the intermediate, individual steps. In this study, we primarily examine the essential hub protein LC8, a small dimer that binds disordered regions of 100+ client proteins in two symmetrical grooves at the dimer interface. Mechanistic details of LC8 binding have remained elusive, hampered in part by ITC data analyses employing simple models that treat bivalent binding as a single event with a single binding affinity. We build on existing Bayesian ITC approaches to quantify thermodynamic parameters for multi-site binding interactions impacted by significant uncertainty in protein concentration. Using a two-site binding model, we identify positive cooperativity with high confidence for LC8 binding to multiple client peptides. In contrast, application of an identical model to the two-site binding between the coiled-coil NudE dimer and the intermediate chain of dynein reveals little evidence of cooperativity. We propose that cooperativity in the LC8 system drives the formation of saturated induced-dimer structures, the functional units of most LC8 complexes. In addition to these system-specific findings, our work advances general ITC analysis in two ways. First, we describe a previously unrecognized mathematical ambiguity in concentrations in standard binding models and clarify how it impacts the precision with which binding parameters are determinable in cases of high uncertainty in analyte concentrations. Second, building on observations in the LC8 system, we develop a system-agnostic heat map of practical parameter identifiability calculated from synthetic data which demonstrates that the ability to determine microscopic binding parameters is strongly dependent on both the parameters themselves and experimental conditions. The work serves as a foundation for determination of multi-step binding interactions, and we outline best practices for Bayesian analysis of ITC experiments.Author summary: Multi-site protein-protein interactions govern many protein functions throughout the cell. Precise determination of thermodynamic constants of multi-site binding is a significant challenge, however. The application of complex models to multi-step interactions is difficult and hampered further by complications arising from uncertainty in analyte concentrations. To extract binding parameter estimates from minimal and hard-to-obtain data on these large complicated systems, we utilize Bayesian statistical techniques which calculate the ‘likelihood’ of parameters giving rise to experimental observations. Bayesian computations yield probability density distributions for thermodynamic parameters of binding. To demonstrate the validity of the method and improve our understanding how the hub protein LC8 promotes dimerization of its 100+ binding partners, we test the pipeline on several of these partners and demonstrate that LC8 can bind clients cooperatively, driving interactions towards a ‘fully bound’ functional state. We additionally examine an interaction between the dimer NudE and the intermediate chain of dynein, which does not appear to bind with cooperativity. Our work provides a solid foundation for future analysis of more complicated binding interactions, including oligomeric complexes formed between LC8 and clients with multiple LC8-binding sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Aidan B Estelle & August George & Elisar J Barbar & Daniel M Zuckerman, 2023. "Quantifying cooperative multisite binding in the hub protein LC8 through Bayesian inference," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-28, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011059
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011059
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011059&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.