IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1010871.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Receptive field sizes and neuronal encoding bandwidth are constrained by axonal conduction delays

Author

Listed:
  • Tim C Hladnik
  • Jan Grewe

Abstract

Studies on population coding implicitly assume that spikes from the presynaptic cells arrive simultaneously at the integrating neuron. In natural neuronal populations, this is usually not the case—neuronal signaling takes time and populations cover a certain space. The spread of spike arrival times depends on population size, cell density and axonal conduction velocity. Here we analyze the consequences of population size and axonal conduction delays on the stimulus encoding performance in the electrosensory system of the electric fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus. We experimentally locate p-type electroreceptor afferents along the rostro-caudal body axis and relate locations to neurophysiological response properties. In an information-theoretical approach we analyze the coding performance in homogeneous and heterogeneous populations. As expected, the amount of information increases with population size and, on average, heterogeneous populations encode better than the average same-size homogeneous population, if conduction delays are compensated for. The spread of neuronal conduction delays within a receptive field strongly degrades encoding of high-frequency stimulus components. Receptive field sizes typically found in the electrosensory lateral line lobe of A. leptorhynchus appear to be a good compromise between the spread of conduction delays and encoding performance. The limitations imposed by finite axonal conduction velocity are relevant for any converging network as is shown by model populations of LIF neurons. The bandwidth of natural stimuli and the maximum meaningful population sizes are constrained by conduction delays and may thus impact the optimal design of nervous systems.Author summary: Reading out the activity of a population of neurons can yield a more complete picture of the stimulus space. Generally, increasing population sizes increases the amount of information. This applies to homogeneous populations of similarly tuned neurons as well as to heterogeneous ones. So far studies on population coding assumed that information reaches the integrating neuron simultaneously. But neurons are neither disembodied nor does neuronal signaling happen instantaneously; populations cover a certain space and axonal conduction takes time. The interplay of encoding bandwidth, receptive field, respective population, size and axonal conduction velocity has not been addressed before. Our results from the electrosensory system and of model simulations show that stimulus dynamics, receptive field sizes, and conduction velocity have to be factored in when we want to understand the design of nervous systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim C Hladnik & Jan Grewe, 2023. "Receptive field sizes and neuronal encoding bandwidth are constrained by axonal conduction delays," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-25, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010871
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010871
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010871
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010871&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010871?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.