IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1010575.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing laboratory-based surveillance networks for monitoring multi-genotype or multi-serotype infections

Author

Listed:
  • Qu Cheng
  • Philip A Collender
  • Alexandra K Heaney
  • Aidan McLoughlin
  • Yang Yang
  • Yuzi Zhang
  • Jennifer R Head
  • Rohini Dasan
  • Song Liang
  • Qiang Lv
  • Yaqiong Liu
  • Changhong Yang
  • Howard H Chang
  • Lance A Waller
  • Jon Zelner
  • Joseph A Lewnard
  • Justin V Remais

Abstract

With the aid of laboratory typing techniques, infectious disease surveillance networks have the opportunity to obtain powerful information on the emergence, circulation, and evolution of multiple genotypes, serotypes or other subtypes of pathogens, informing understanding of transmission dynamics and strategies for prevention and control. The volume of typing performed on clinical isolates is typically limited by its ability to inform clinical care, cost and logistical constraints, especially in comparison with the capacity to monitor clinical reports of disease occurrence, which remains the most widespread form of public health surveillance. Viewing clinical disease reports as arising from a latent mixture of pathogen subtypes, laboratory typing of a subset of clinical cases can provide inference on the proportion of clinical cases attributable to each subtype (i.e., the mixture components). Optimizing protocols for the selection of isolates for typing by weighting specific subpopulations, locations, time periods, or case characteristics (e.g., disease severity), may improve inference of the frequency and distribution of pathogen subtypes within and between populations. Here, we apply the Disease Surveillance Informatics Optimization and Simulation (DIOS) framework to simulate and optimize hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) surveillance in a high-burden region of western China. We identify laboratory surveillance designs that significantly outperform the existing network: the optimal network reduced mean absolute error in estimated serotype-specific incidence rates by 14.1%; similarly, the optimal network for monitoring severe cases reduced mean absolute error in serotype-specific incidence rates by 13.3%. In both cases, the optimal network designs achieved improved inference without increasing subtyping effort. We demonstrate how the DIOS framework can be used to optimize surveillance networks by augmenting clinical diagnostic data with limited laboratory typing resources, while adapting to specific, local surveillance objectives and constraints.Author summary: Laboratory-based tests can determine the specific agents that cause infectious diseases, providing important information for disease surveillance, and helping to understand the transmissibility, clinical spectrum, evolutionary trends, and subtype-specific risk factors of infections caused by pathogens with multiple types. However, pathogen typing is relatively expensive and scarce, and thus there is widespread interest in the optimal allocation of laboratory typing resources in the design of disease surveillance systems, even as such surveillance optimization methods have been understudied. Here we apply the Disease Surveillance Informatics Optimization and Simulation (DIOS) framework to the problem of optimal allocation of laboratory-typing within clinical surveillance systems. We develop methods for optimizing allocation of laboratory-typing across locations and clinical subgroups (e.g., severe vs. mild cases), and demonstrate the approach using real-world data from a surveillance network monitoring Hand Foot and Mouth Disease in western China. Using a series of simulation-optimization studies, we identified surveillance networks that are capable of reducing the mean absolute error of serotype-specific incidence rates by 13.3% among severe cases, and 14.1% among all cases. The methods demonstrated here are but one of many approaches through which the DIOS framework could be utilized to better leverage laboratory-typing infrastructure to track pathogen-specific epidemiologic trends.

Suggested Citation

  • Qu Cheng & Philip A Collender & Alexandra K Heaney & Aidan McLoughlin & Yang Yang & Yuzi Zhang & Jennifer R Head & Rohini Dasan & Song Liang & Qiang Lv & Yaqiong Liu & Changhong Yang & Howard H Chang , 2022. "Optimizing laboratory-based surveillance networks for monitoring multi-genotype or multi-serotype infections," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-23, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010575
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010575
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010575&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010575?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leigh Fisher & Jon Wakefield & Cici Bauer & Steve Self, 2017. "Time series modeling of pathogen-specific disease probabilities with subsampled data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 283-293, March.
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0051244 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.