IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1010565.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Density-dependent effects are the main determinants of variation in growth dynamics between closely related bacterial strains

Author

Listed:
  • Sabrin Hilau
  • Sophia Katz
  • Tanya Wasserman
  • Ruth Hershberg
  • Yonatan Savir

Abstract

Although closely related, bacterial strains from the same species show significant diversity in their growth and death dynamics. Yet, our understanding of the relationship between the kinetic parameters that dictate these dynamics is still lacking. Here, we measured the growth and death dynamics of 11 strains of Escherichia coli originating from different hosts and show that the growth patterns are clustered into three major classes with typical growth rates, maximal fold change, and death rates. To infer the underlying phenotypic parameters that govern the dynamics, we developed a phenomenological mathematical model that accounts not only for growth rate and its dependence on resource availability, but also for death rates and density-dependent growth inhibition. We show that density-dependent growth is essential for capturing the variability in growth dynamics between the strains. Indeed, the main parameter determining the dynamics is the typical density at which they slow down their growth, rather than the maximal growth rate or death rate. Moreover, we show that the phenotypic landscape resides within a two-dimensional plane spanned by resource utilization efficiency, death rate, and density-dependent growth inhibition. In this phenotypic plane, we identify three clusters that correspond to the growth pattern classes. Overall, our results reveal the tradeoffs between growth parameters that constrain bacterial adaptation.Author summary: Even bacteria within the same strain have significant variability in their parameters that dictates their growth dynamics, such as maximal growth rate and death rate. The tradeoffs between these different parameters affect bacteria’s ability to adapt to different environments. Here, we analyzed strains of the bacteria Escherichia coli from different animal hosts and showed that their growth dynamics are clustered into three typical classes. To understand the underlying processes that dictate this variability, we developed a mathematical model and used it to infer the kinetic parameters of each strain. Our results show that a density-dependent growth term is crucial to explaining the experimental data. We show that the primary determinant of maximal biomass of each strain is not its maximal growth rate or death rate but rather the critical density at which growth is inhibited. We characterize the tradeoffs between the different kinetic parameters and show that the difference between the strains can be reduced to a two-dimensional plane. In this plane, the strains are divided into three main types with different kinetic parameters that define the typical growth patterns. Our results show how the tradeoffs between different growth parameters constrain growth dynamics and the ability of bacteria to adapt to different environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabrin Hilau & Sophia Katz & Tanya Wasserman & Ruth Hershberg & Yonatan Savir, 2022. "Density-dependent effects are the main determinants of variation in growth dynamics between closely related bacterial strains," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(10), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010565
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010565
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010565&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010565?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.