Author
Listed:
- Yingtian Hu
- Yunxiao Li
- Glen A Satten
- Yi-Juan Hu
Abstract
Background: Finding microbiome associations with possibly censored survival times is an important problem, especially as specific taxa could serve as biomarkers for disease prognosis or as targets for therapeutic interventions. The two existing methods for survival outcomes, MiRKAT-S and OMiSA, are restricted to testing associations at the community level and do not provide results at the individual taxon level. An ad hoc approach testing each taxon with a survival outcome using the Cox proportional hazard model may not perform well in the microbiome setting with sparse count data and small sample sizes. Methods: We have previously developed the linear decomposition model (LDM) for testing continuous or discrete outcomes that unifies community-level and taxon-level tests into one framework. Here we extend the LDM to test survival outcomes. We propose to use the Martingale residuals or the deviance residuals obtained from the Cox model as continuous covariates in the LDM. We further construct tests that combine the results of analyzing each set of residuals separately. Finally, we extend PERMANOVA, the most commonly used distance-based method for testing community-level hypotheses, to handle survival outcomes in a similar manner. Results: Using simulated data, we showed that the LDM-based tests preserved the false discovery rate for testing individual taxa and had good sensitivity. The LDM-based community-level tests and PERMANOVA-based tests had comparable or better power than MiRKAT-S and OMiSA. An analysis of data on the association of the gut microbiome and the time to acute graft-versus-host disease revealed several dozen associated taxa that would not have been achievable by any community-level test, as well as improved community-level tests by the LDM and PERMANOVA over those obtained using MiRKAT-S and OMiSA. Conclusions: Unlike existing methods, our new methods are capable of discovering individual taxa that are associated with survival times, which could be of important use in clinical settings. Author summary: High-throughput sequencing of 16S gene or metagenomes provides an unprecedented opportunity to discover microbial associations with traits such as clinical outcomes or environmental factors. Detecting individual taxa associated with survival times has significant implications: the taxa could serve as biomarkers for disease prognosis or as targets for therapeutic interventions. However, the taxon data are highly complex because they are high-dimensional, sparse (having 50–90% zero counts), and highly overdispersed. Existing methods for microbial associations with survival outcomes are restricted to testing associations at the community level and do not provide results at the individual taxon level. An ad hoc approach testing each taxon with a survival outcome using the Cox proportional hazard model may not perform well in the microbiome setting with sparse count data. We present an approach that can be used by the LDM and PERMANOVA for testing microbial associations with survival outcomes at both the community and individual taxon levels. In particular, we provide the first test at the individual taxon level. Therefore, our work represents a major advance in analytical methods for microbial association studies and will have a strong impact on current and future microbiome research in clinical settings.
Suggested Citation
Yingtian Hu & Yunxiao Li & Glen A Satten & Yi-Juan Hu, 2022.
"Testing microbiome associations with survival times at both the community and individual taxon levels,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-17, September.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010509
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010509
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.