Author
Listed:
- Jennifer Brennan
- Lalit Jain
- Sofia Garman
- Ann E Donnelly
- Erik Scott Wright
- Kevin Jamieson
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance is an important public health problem. One potential solution is the development of synergistic antibiotic combinations, in which the combination is more effective than the component drugs. However, experimental progress in this direction is severely limited by the number of samples required to exhaustively test for synergy, which grows exponentially with the number of drugs combined. We introduce a new metric for antibiotic synergy, motivated by the popular Fractional Inhibitory Concentration Index and the Highest Single Agent model. We also propose a new experimental design that samples along all appropriately normalized diagonals in concentration space, and prove that this design identifies all synergies among a set of drugs while only sampling a small fraction of the possible combinations. We applied our method to screen two- through eight-way combinations of eight antibiotics at 10 concentrations each, which requires sampling only 2,560 unique combinations of antibiotic concentrations.Author summary: Antibiotic resistance is a growing public health concern, and there is an increasing need for methods to combat it. One potential approach is the development of synergistic antibiotic combinations, in which a mixture of drugs is more effective than any individual component. Unfortunately, the search for clinically beneficial drug combinations is severely restricted by the pace at which drugs can be screened. To date, most studies of combination therapies have been limited to testing only pairs or triples of drugs. These studies have identified primarily antagonistic drug interactions, in which the combination is less effective than the individual components. There is an acute need for methodologies that enable screening of higher-order drug combinations, both to identify synergies among many drugs and to understand the behavior of higher-order combinations. In this work we introduce a new paradigm for combination testing, the normalized diagonal sampling design, that makes identifying interactions among eight or more drugs feasible for the first time. Screening d drugs at m different combinations requires m ⋅ 2d samples under our design as opposed to md under exhaustive screening, while provably identifying all synergies under mild assumptions about antibiotic behavior. Scientists can use our design to quickly screen for antibiotic interactions, accelerating the pace of combination therapy development.
Suggested Citation
Jennifer Brennan & Lalit Jain & Sofia Garman & Ann E Donnelly & Erik Scott Wright & Kevin Jamieson, 2022.
"Sample-efficient identification of high-dimensional antibiotic synergy with a normalized diagonal sampling design,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-16, July.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010311
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010311
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Avichai Tendler & Anat Zimmer & Avi Mayo & Uri Alon, 2019.
"Noise-precision tradeoff in predicting combinations of mutations and drugs,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, May.
- Mohan Bi & Huiying Li & Peter Meidl & Yanjie Zhu & Masahiro Ryo & Matthias C. Rillig, 2024.
"Number and dissimilarity of global change factors influences soil properties and functions,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.