IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1010200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic evaluation of deep learning methods for the prediction of drug synergy in cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Delora Baptista
  • Pedro G Ferreira
  • Miguel Rocha

Abstract

One of the main obstacles to the successful treatment of cancer is the phenomenon of drug resistance. A common strategy to overcome resistance is the use of combination therapies. However, the space of possibilities is huge and efficient search strategies are required. Machine Learning (ML) can be a useful tool for the discovery of novel, clinically relevant anti-cancer drug combinations. In particular, deep learning (DL) has become a popular choice for modeling drug combination effects. Here, we set out to examine the impact of different methodological choices on the performance of multimodal DL-based drug synergy prediction methods, including the use of different input data types, preprocessing steps and model architectures. Focusing on the NCI ALMANAC dataset, we found that feature selection based on prior biological knowledge has a positive impact—limiting gene expression data to cancer or drug response-specific genes improved performance. Drug features appeared to be more predictive of drug response, with a 41% increase in coefficient of determination (R2) and 26% increase in Spearman correlation relative to a baseline model that used only cell line and drug identifiers. Molecular fingerprint-based drug representations performed slightly better than learned representations—ECFP4 fingerprints increased R2 by 5.3% and Spearman correlation by 2.8% w.r.t the best learned representations. In general, fully connected feature-encoding subnetworks outperformed other architectures. DL outperformed other ML methods by more than 35% (R2) and 14% (Spearman). Additionally, an ensemble combining the top DL and ML models improved performance by about 6.5% (R2) and 4% (Spearman). Using a state-of-the-art interpretability method, we showed that DL models can learn to associate drug and cell line features with drug response in a biologically meaningful way. The strategies explored in this study will help to improve the development of computational methods for the rational design of effective drug combinations for cancer therapy.Author summary: Cancer therapies often fail because tumor cells become resistant to treatment. One way to overcome resistance is by treating patients with a combination of two or more drugs. Some combinations may be more effective than when considering individual drug effects, a phenomenon called drug synergy. Computational drug synergy prediction methods can help to identify new, clinically relevant drug combinations. In this study, we developed several deep learning models for drug synergy prediction. We examined the effect of using different types of deep learning architectures, and different ways of representing drugs and cancer cell lines. We explored the use of biological prior knowledge to select relevant cell line features, and also tested data-driven feature reduction methods. We tested both precomputed drug features and deep learning methods that can directly learn features from raw representations of molecules. We also evaluated whether including genomic features, in addition to gene expression data, improves the predictive performance of the models. Through these experiments, we were able to identify strategies that will help guide the development of new deep learning models for drug synergy prediction in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Delora Baptista & Pedro G Ferreira & Miguel Rocha, 2023. "A systematic evaluation of deep learning methods for the prediction of drug synergy in cancer," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-26, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010200
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010200
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010200&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K. Yu & B. Chen & D. Aran & J. Charalel & C. Yau & D. M. Wolf & L. J. ‘t Veer & A. J. Butte & T. Goldstein & M. Sirota, 2019. "Comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of cell lines as models of primary tumors across 22 tumor types," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Jiaqi Li & Hongyan Xu & Richard A McIndoe, 2022. "A novel network based linear model for prioritization of synergistic drug combinations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Michael P. Menden & Dennis Wang & Mike J. Mason & Bence Szalai & Krishna C. Bulusu & Yuanfang Guan & Thomas Yu & Jaewoo Kang & Minji Jeon & Russ Wolfinger & Tin Nguyen & Mikhail Zaslavskiy & In Sock J, 2019. "Community assessment to advance computational prediction of cancer drug combinations in a pharmacogenomic screen," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Mohieddin Jafari & Mehdi Mirzaie & Jie Bao & Farnaz Barneh & Shuyu Zheng & Johanna Eriksson & Caroline A. Heckman & Jing Tang, 2022. "Bipartite network models to design combination therapies in acute myeloid leukaemia," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuchen Bai & Carolin Gotz & Ginevra Chincarini & Zixuan Zhao & Clare Slaney & Jarryd Boath & Luc Furic & Christopher Angel & Stephen M. Jane & Wayne A. Phillips & Steven A. Stacker & Camile S. Farah &, 2023. "YBX1 integration of oncogenic PI3K/mTOR signalling regulates the fitness of malignant epithelial cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Peyman Choopanian & Jaan-Olle Andressoo & Mehdi Mirzaie, 2025. "A fast approach for structural and evolutionary analysis based on energetic profile protein comparison," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. L. Mathur & B. Szalai & N. H. Du & R. Utharala & M. Ballinger & J. J. M. Landry & M. Ryckelynck & V. Benes & J. Saez-Rodriguez & C. A. Merten, 2022. "Combi-seq for multiplexed transcriptome-based profiling of drug combinations using deterministic barcoding in single-cell droplets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Yeo-Jun Yoon & Donghyun Kim & Kwon Yong Tak & Seungyeon Hwang & Jisun Kim & Nam Suk Sim & Jae-Min Cho & Dojin Choi & Youngmi Ji & Junho K. Hur & Hyunki Kim & Jong-Eun Park & Jae-Yol Lim, 2022. "Salivary gland organoid culture maintains distinct glandular properties of murine and human major salivary glands," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Boshu Ouyang & Caihua Shan & Shun Shen & Xinnan Dai & Qingwang Chen & Xiaomin Su & Yongbin Cao & Xifeng Qin & Ying He & Siyu Wang & Ruizhe Xu & Ruining Hu & Leming Shi & Tun Lu & Wuli Yang & Shaojun P, 2024. "AI-powered omics-based drug pair discovery for pyroptosis therapy targeting triple-negative breast cancer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Nishanth Ulhas Nair & Patricia Greninger & Xiaohu Zhang & Adam A. Friedman & Arnaud Amzallag & Eliane Cortez & Avinash Das Sahu & Joo Sang Lee & Anahita Dastur & Regina K. Egan & Ellen Murchie & Miche, 2023. "A landscape of response to drug combinations in non-small cell lung cancer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Sean M. Gross & Farnaz Mohammadi & Crystal Sanchez-Aguila & Paulina J. Zhan & Tiera A. Liby & Mark A. Dane & Aaron S. Meyer & Laura M. Heiser, 2023. "Analysis and modeling of cancer drug responses using cell cycle phase-specific rate effects," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Han Jin & Cheng Zhang & Martin Zwahlen & Kalle Feilitzen & Max Karlsson & Mengnan Shi & Meng Yuan & Xiya Song & Xiangyu Li & Hong Yang & Hasan Turkez & Linn Fagerberg & Mathias Uhlén & Adil Mardinoglu, 2023. "Systematic transcriptional analysis of human cell lines for gene expression landscape and tumor representation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Jiaqi Li & Hongyan Xu & Richard A McIndoe, 2022. "A novel network based linear model for prioritization of synergistic drug combinations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-22, April.
    10. Hanrui Zhang & Julian Kreis & Sven-Eric Schelhorn & Heike Dahmen & Thomas Grombacher & Michael Zühlsdorf & Frank T. Zenke & Yuanfang Guan, 2023. "Mapping combinatorial drug effects to DNA damage response kinase inhibitors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-8, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.