IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1010130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists

Author

Listed:
  • Carla Bautista
  • Narjes Alfuraiji
  • Anna Drangowska-Way
  • Karishma Gangwani
  • Alida de Flamingh
  • Philip E Bourne

Abstract

Communication is a fundamental part of scientific development and methodology. With the advancement of the internet and social networks, communication has become rapid and sometimes overwhelming, especially in science. It is important to provide scientists with useful, effective, and dynamic tools to establish and build a fluid communication framework that allows for scientific advancement. Therefore, in this article, we present advice and recommendations that can help promote and improve science communication while respecting an adequate balance in the degree of commitment toward collaborative work. We have developed 10 rules shown in increasing order of commitment that are grouped into 3 key categories: (1) speak (based on active participation); (2) join (based on joining scientific groups); and (3) assess (based on the analysis and retrospective consideration of the weaknesses and strengths). We include examples and resources that provide actionable strategies for involvement and engagement with science communication, from basic steps to more advanced, introspective, and long-term commitments. Overall, we aim to help spread science from within and encourage and engage scientists to become involved in science communication effectively and dynamically.

Suggested Citation

  • Carla Bautista & Narjes Alfuraiji & Anna Drangowska-Way & Karishma Gangwani & Alida de Flamingh & Philip E Bourne, 2022. "Ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(6), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010130
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010130
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010130&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010130?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Todd C Peterson & Sofie R Kleppner & Crystal M Botham, 2018. "Ten simple rules for scientists: Improving your writing productivity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-6, October.
    2. Thomas C Erren & Philip E Bourne, 2007. "Ten Simple Rules for a Good Poster Presentation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(5), pages 1-2, May.
    3. Quentin Vicens & Philip E Bourne, 2007. "Ten Simple Rules for a Successful Collaboration," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(3), pages 1-2, March.
    4. Philip E Bourne, 2007. "Ten Simple Rules for Making Good Oral Presentations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(4), pages 1-2, April.
    5. Philip E Bourne & Virginia Barbour, 2011. "Ten Simple Rules for Building and Maintaining a Scientific Reputation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-2, June.
    6. Veronika Cheplygina & Felienne Hermans & Casper Albers & Natalia Bielczyk & Ionica Smeets, 2020. "Ten simple rules for getting started on Twitter as a scientist," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-9, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cameron Mura & Mike Chalupa & Abigail M Newbury & Jack Chalupa & Philip E Bourne, 2020. "Ten simple rules for starting research in your late teens," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-11, November.
    2. Shayna A Sura & Lauren L Smith & Monique R Ambrose & C Eduardo Guerra Amorim & Annabel C Beichman & Ana C R Gomez & Mark Juhn & Gaurav S Kandlikar & Julie S Miller & Jazlyn Mooney & Riley O Mummah & K, 2019. "Ten simple rules for giving an effective academic job talk," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-8, July.
    3. Jenny Gu & Philip E Bourne, 2007. "Ten Simple Rules for Graduate Students," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(11), pages 1-2, November.
    4. Weixiong Zhang, 2014. "Ten Simple Rules for Writing Research Papers," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-3, January.
    5. Greg J McInerny, 2016. "Ten Simple Rules for Curating and Facilitating Small Workshops," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-8, July.
    6. Faisal M Fadlelmola & Sumir Panji & Azza E Ahmed & Amel Ghouila & Wisdom A Akurugu & Jean-Baka Domelevo Entfellner & Oussema Souiai & Nicola Mulder & H3ABioNet Research working group as members of the, 2019. "Ten simple rules for organizing a webinar series," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-7, April.
    7. David B Searls, 2014. "A New Online Computational Biology Curriculum," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-3, June.
    8. Richard de Grijs, 2015. "Ten Simple Rules for Establishing International Research Collaborations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-7, October.
    9. Veronika Cheplygina & Felienne Hermans & Casper Albers & Natalia Bielczyk & Ionica Smeets, 2020. "Ten simple rules for getting started on Twitter as a scientist," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-9, February.
    10. Rosemary Dickin & Chris James Hall & Laura K Taylor & Andrew M Collings & Ruth Nussinov & Philip E Bourne, 2012. "A Review of 2011 for PLoS Computational Biology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-2, January.
    11. Wei Yu & Junpeng Chen & Sanhong Deng, 2024. "Open Science Under Debate: Disentangling the Interest on Twitter and Scholarly Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
    12. Megan Yu & Yu-Min Kuo, 2017. "Ten simple rules to make the most out of your undergraduate research career," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-7, May.
    13. Oliver Budzinski & Thomas Grebel & Jens Wolling & Xijie Zhang, 2020. "Drivers of article processing charges in open access," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(3), pages 2185-2206, September.
    14. Marieke A Frassl & David P Hamilton & Blaize A Denfeld & Elvira de Eyto & Stephanie E Hampton & Philipp S Keller & Sapna Sharma & Abigail S L Lewis & Gesa A Weyhenmeyer & Catherine M O’Reilly & Mary E, 2018. "Ten simple rules for collaboratively writing a multi-authored paper," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-8, November.
    15. Edgardo Moreno & José-María Gutiérrez, 2008. "Ten Simple Rules for Aspiring Scientists in a Low-Income Country," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(5), pages 1-2, May.
    16. Hoe-Han Goh & Philip Bourne, 2020. "Ten simple rules for writing scientific op-ed articles," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-4, September.
    17. Zhichao Fang & Rodrigo Costas & Paul Wouters, 2022. "User engagement with scholarly tweets of scientific papers: a large-scale and cross-disciplinary analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4523-4546, August.
    18. Thomas C Erren & Philip E Bourne, 2007. "Ten Simple Rules for a Good Poster Presentation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(5), pages 1-2, May.
    19. Giovanni M Dall'Olio & Jacopo Marino & Michael Schubert & Kevin L Keys & Melanie I Stefan & Colin S Gillespie & Pierre Poulain & Khader Shameer & Robert Sugar & Brandon M Invergo & Lars J Jensen & Jau, 2011. "Ten Simple Rules for Getting Help from Online Scientific Communities," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-3, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.