IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1010091.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CBEA: Competitive balances for taxonomic enrichment analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Quang P Nguyen
  • Anne G Hoen
  • H Robert Frost

Abstract

Research in human-associated microbiomes often involves the analysis of taxonomic count tables generated via high-throughput sequencing. It is difficult to apply statistical tools as the data is high-dimensional, sparse, and compositional. An approachable way to alleviate high-dimensionality and sparsity is to aggregate variables into pre-defined sets. Set-based analysis is ubiquitous in the genomics literature and has demonstrable impact on improving interpretability and power of downstream analysis. Unfortunately, there is a lack of sophisticated set-based analysis methods specific to microbiome taxonomic data, where current practice often employs abundance summation as a technique for aggregation. This approach prevents comparison across sets of different sizes, does not preserve inter-sample distances, and amplifies protocol bias. Here, we attempt to fill this gap with a new single-sample taxon enrichment method that uses a novel log-ratio formulation based on the competitive null hypothesis commonly used in the enrichment analysis literature. Our approach, titled competitive balances for taxonomic enrichment analysis (CBEA), generates sample-specific enrichment scores as the scaled log-ratio of the subcomposition defined by taxa within a set and the subcomposition defined by its complement. We provide sample-level significance testing by estimating an empirical null distribution of our test statistic with valid p-values. Herein, we demonstrate, using both real data applications and simulations, that CBEA controls for type I error, even under high sparsity and high inter-taxa correlation scenarios. Additionally, CBEA provides informative scores that can be inputs to downstream analyses such as prediction tasks.Author summary: The study of human-associated microbiomes relies on genomic surveys via high-throughput sequencing. However, microbiome taxonomic data is sparse and high-dimensional which prevents the application of standard statistical techniques. One approach to address this problem is to perform analyses at the level of taxon sets. Set-based analysis has a long history in the genomics literature, with demonstrable impact on improving both power and interpretability. Unfortunately, there is limited interest in developing new set-based tools tailored for microbiome taxonomic data given its unique features compared to other ‘omics data types. We developed a new tool to generate taxon set enrichment scores at the sample level through a novel log-ratio formulation based on the competitive null hypothesis. Our scores can be used for statistical inference at both the sample and population levels, and as inputs to other downstream analyses such as prediction models. We demonstrate the performance of our method against competing approaches across both real data analyses and simulation studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Quang P Nguyen & Anne G Hoen & H Robert Frost, 2022. "CBEA: Competitive balances for taxonomic enrichment analysis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-24, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010091
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010091
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010091&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010091. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.