IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1009855.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chiral evasion and stereospecific antifolate resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

Author

Listed:
  • Siyu Wang
  • Stephanie M Reeve
  • Graham T Holt
  • Adegoke A Ojewole
  • Marcel S Frenkel
  • Pablo Gainza
  • Santosh Keshipeddy
  • Vance G Fowler
  • Dennis L Wright
  • Bruce R Donald

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance presents a significant health care crisis. The mutation F98Y in Staphylococcus aureus dihydrofolate reductase (SaDHFR) confers resistance to the clinically important antifolate trimethoprim (TMP). Propargyl-linked antifolates (PLAs), next generation DHFR inhibitors, are much more resilient than TMP against this F98Y variant, yet this F98Y substitution still reduces efficacy of these agents. Surprisingly, differences in the enantiomeric configuration at the stereogenic center of PLAs influence the isomeric state of the NADPH cofactor. To understand the molecular basis of F98Y-mediated resistance and how PLAs’ inhibition drives NADPH isomeric states, we used protein design algorithms in the osprey protein design software suite to analyze a comprehensive suite of structural, biophysical, biochemical, and computational data. Here, we present a model showing how F98Y SaDHFR exploits a different anomeric configuration of NADPH to evade certain PLAs’ inhibition, while other PLAs remain unaffected by this resistance mechanism.Author summary: Antimicrobial resistance is a major healthcare crisis. While we were developing novel enzyme inhibitors to combat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), we found that the chirality of both inhibitor and cofactor can have a large influence on inhibitor potency. Our detailed study of enantiomeric propargyl-linked antifolates (PLAs) shows that the chiral state of inhibitors can affect the chiral state of the cofactor. Moreover, the bacterial enzyme target can exploit cooperative chirality to evade inhibitor binding. We call this phenomenon chiral evasion. Using crystal structures, biochemical assays, computational protein design algorithms, and statistical mechanics, a detailed mechanism for chiral evasion is proposed. While the concept that different enantiomers have different biology is well known, MRSA is unique: we do not know of any other cases where a single mutation (F98Y) flips the chirality preference for cofactor binding and induces stereospecificity for drug binding. Thus, we illuminate the effect of this clinically relevant resistance mutation on the obligate cofactor binding site. These new insights will be useful to develop more durable antibiotics that are resilient to resistance.

Suggested Citation

  • Siyu Wang & Stephanie M Reeve & Graham T Holt & Adegoke A Ojewole & Marcel S Frenkel & Pablo Gainza & Santosh Keshipeddy & Vance G Fowler & Dennis L Wright & Bruce R Donald, 2022. "Chiral evasion and stereospecific antifolate resistance in Staphylococcus aureus," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-22, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1009855
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009855
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009855
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009855&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009855?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1009855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.