IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1009309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

SUITOR: Selecting the number of mutational signatures through cross-validation

Author

Listed:
  • Donghyuk Lee
  • Difei Wang
  • Xiaohong R Yang
  • Jianxin Shi
  • Maria Teresa Landi
  • Bin Zhu

Abstract

For de novo mutational signature analysis, the critical first step is to decide how many signatures should be expected in a cancer genomics study. An incorrect number could mislead downstream analyses. Here we present SUITOR (Selecting the nUmber of mutatIonal signaTures thrOugh cRoss-validation), an unsupervised cross-validation method that requires little assumptions and no numerical approximations to select the optimal number of signatures without overfitting the data. In vitro studies and in silico simulations demonstrated that SUITOR can correctly identify signatures, some of which were missed by other widely used methods. Applied to 2,540 whole-genome sequenced tumors across 22 cancer types, SUITOR selected signatures with the smallest prediction errors and almost all signatures of breast cancer selected by SUITOR were validated in an independent breast cancer study. SUITOR is a powerful tool to select the optimal number of mutational signatures, facilitating downstream analyses with etiological or therapeutic importance.Author summary: Mutational signatures are the footprints of exogenous exposures and endogenous mutational processes on the cancer genomes. To estimate de novo mutational signatures, the first step is to decide how many signatures should be extracted in a cancer genomics study, which determines downstream analytical steps and has been insufficiently studied. We developed SUITOR, an unsupervised cross-validation method to select the optimal number of signatures without overfitting the data. We demonstrated SUITOR’s superior performance using in vitro experimental studies, in silico simulations and in vivo pan-cancer applications of 2,540 whole-genome sequenced tumors across 22 cancer types, and validated signatures of breast cancer in additional 440 breast tumors. SUITOR advances the methodological frontier of identifying de novo mutational signatures and would help discover the causes of cancer and the means of cancer prevention and treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Donghyuk Lee & Difei Wang & Xiaohong R Yang & Jianxin Shi & Maria Teresa Landi & Bin Zhu, 2022. "SUITOR: Selecting the number of mutational signatures through cross-validation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-27, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1009309
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009309
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009309&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009309?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1009309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.