IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1008276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncertainty-driven regulation of learning and exploration in adolescents: A computational account

Author

Listed:
  • Marieke Jepma
  • Jessica V Schaaf
  • Ingmar Visser
  • Hilde M Huizenga

Abstract

Healthy adults flexibly adapt their learning strategies to ongoing changes in uncertainty, a key feature of adaptive behaviour. However, the developmental trajectory of this ability is yet unknown, as developmental studies have not incorporated trial-to-trial variation in uncertainty in their analyses or models. To address this issue, we compared adolescents’ and adults’ trial-to-trial dynamics of uncertainty, learning rate, and exploration in two tasks that assess learning in noisy but otherwise stable environments. In an estimation task—which provides direct indices of trial-specific learning rate—both age groups reduced their learning rate over time, as self-reported uncertainty decreased. Accordingly, the estimation data in both groups was better explained by a Bayesian model with dynamic learning rate (Kalman filter) than by conventional reinforcement-learning models. Furthermore, adolescents’ learning rates asymptoted at a higher level, reflecting an over-weighting of the most recent outcome, and the estimated Kalman-filter parameters suggested that this was due to an overestimation of environmental volatility. In a choice task, both age groups became more likely to choose the higher-valued option over time, but this increase in choice accuracy was smaller in the adolescents. In contrast to the estimation task, we found no evidence for a Bayesian expectation-updating process in the choice task, suggesting that estimation and choice tasks engage different learning processes. However, our modeling results of the choice task suggested that both age groups reduced their degree of exploration over time, and that the adolescents explored overall more than the adults. Finally, age-related differences in exploration parameters from fits to the choice data were mediated by participants’ volatility parameter from fits to the estimation data. Together, these results suggest that adolescents overestimate the rate of environmental change, resulting in elevated learning rates and increased exploration, which may help understand developmental changes in learning and decision-making.Author summary: To successfully learn the value of stimuli and actions, people should take into account their current (un)certainty about these values: Learning rates and exploration should be high when one’s value estimates are highly uncertain (in the beginning of learning), and decrease over time as evidence accumulates and uncertainty decreases. Recent studies have shown that healthy adults flexibly adapt their learning strategies based on ongoing changes in uncertainty, consistent with normative learning. However, the development of this ability prior to adulthood is yet unknown, as developmental learning studies have not considered trial-to-trial changes in uncertainty. Here, we show that adolescents, as compared to adults, showed a smaller decrease in both learning rate and exploration over time. Computational modeling revealed that both of these effects were due to adolescents overestimating the amount of environmental volatility, which made them more sensitive to recent relative to older evidence. The overestimation of volatility during adolescence may represent the rapidly changing environmental demands during this developmental period, and can help understand the surge in real-life risk taking and exploratory behaviours characteristic of adolescents.

Suggested Citation

  • Marieke Jepma & Jessica V Schaaf & Ingmar Visser & Hilde M Huizenga, 2020. "Uncertainty-driven regulation of learning and exploration in adolescents: A computational account," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-29, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1008276
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008276
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008276&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008276?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew R. Nassar & Rasmus Bruckner & Joshua I. Gold & Shu-Chen Li & Hauke R. Heekeren & Ben Eppinger, 2016. "Age differences in learning emerge from an insufficient representation of uncertainty in older adults," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Stefano Palminteri & Emma J Kilford & Giorgio Coricelli & Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, 2016. "The Computational Development of Reinforcement Learning during Adolescence," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruth Pauli & Inti A. Brazil & Gregor Kohls & Miriam C. Klein-Flügge & Jack C. Rogers & Dimitris Dikeos & Roberta Dochnal & Graeme Fairchild & Aranzazu Fernández-Rivas & Beate Herpertz-Dahlmann & Amaia, 2023. "Action initiation and punishment learning differ from childhood to adolescence while reward learning remains stable," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Anna P. Giron & Simon Ciranka & Eric Schulz & Wouter Bos & Azzurra Ruggeri & Björn Meder & Charley M. Wu, 2023. "Developmental changes in exploration resemble stochastic optimization," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(11), pages 1955-1967, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maël Lebreton & Karin Bacily & Stefano Palminteri & Jan B Engelmann, 2019. "Contextual influence on confidence judgments in human reinforcement learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, April.
    2. Stefano Palminteri & Germain Lefebvre & Emma J Kilford & Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, 2017. "Confirmation bias in human reinforcement learning: Evidence from counterfactual feedback processing," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Anna P. Giron & Simon Ciranka & Eric Schulz & Wouter Bos & Azzurra Ruggeri & Björn Meder & Charley M. Wu, 2023. "Developmental changes in exploration resemble stochastic optimization," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(11), pages 1955-1967, November.
    4. Vincent Moens & Alexandre Zénon, 2019. "Learning and forgetting using reinforced Bayesian change detection," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-41, April.
    5. Payam Piray & Nathaniel D. Daw, 2021. "A model for learning based on the joint estimation of stochasticity and volatility," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Ruth Pauli & Inti A. Brazil & Gregor Kohls & Miriam C. Klein-Flügge & Jack C. Rogers & Dimitris Dikeos & Roberta Dochnal & Graeme Fairchild & Aranzazu Fernández-Rivas & Beate Herpertz-Dahlmann & Amaia, 2023. "Action initiation and punishment learning differ from childhood to adolescence while reward learning remains stable," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1008276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.