IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1007531.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ten simple rules for providing effective bioinformatics research support

Author

Listed:
  • Judit Kumuthini
  • Michael Chimenti
  • Sven Nahnsen
  • Alexander Peltzer
  • Rebone Meraba
  • Ross McFadyen
  • Gordon Wells
  • Deanne Taylor
  • Mark Maienschein-Cline
  • Jian-Liang Li
  • Jyothi Thimmapuram
  • Radha Murthy-Karuturi
  • Lyndon Zass

Abstract

Life scientists are increasingly turning to high-throughput sequencing technologies in their research programs, owing to the enormous potential of these methods. In a parallel manner, the number of core facilities that provide bioinformatics support are also increasing. Notably, the generation of complex large datasets has necessitated the development of bioinformatics support core facilities that aid laboratory scientists with cost-effective and efficient data management, analysis, and interpretation. In this article, we address the challenges—related to communication, good laboratory practice, and data handling—that may be encountered in core support facilities when providing bioinformatics support, drawing on our own experiences working as support bioinformaticians on multidisciplinary research projects. Most importantly, the article proposes a list of guidelines that outline how these challenges can be preemptively avoided and effectively managed to increase the value of outputs to the end user, covering the entire research project lifecycle, including experimental design, data analysis, and management (i.e., sharing and storage). In addition, we highlight the importance of clear and transparent communication, comprehensive preparation, appropriate handling of samples and data using monitoring systems, and the employment of appropriate tools and standard operating procedures to provide effective bioinformatics support.Author summary: The article we wrote draws from our experience in core support facilities and highlights 10 best practices that individuals who apply information technology approaches to biological, medical, and health research should consider when providing support to individuals who generate data for this research in the lab. As interdisciplinary approaches are increasingly being utilized within the biological and medical sciences, effective collaboration and support between the aforementioned parties is crucial to promote the quality and integrity of research. These practices highlight the importance of quality control, comprehensive reporting, effective communication, and more in the production of quality data as well as the promotion of effective collaboration.

Suggested Citation

  • Judit Kumuthini & Michael Chimenti & Sven Nahnsen & Alexander Peltzer & Rebone Meraba & Ross McFadyen & Gordon Wells & Deanne Taylor & Mark Maienschein-Cline & Jian-Liang Li & Jyothi Thimmapuram & Rad, 2020. "Ten simple rules for providing effective bioinformatics research support," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-10, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007531
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007531
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007531
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007531&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007531?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.