IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1007243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatially constrained tumour growth affects the patterns of clonal selection and neutral drift in cancer genomic data

Author

Listed:
  • Ketevan Chkhaidze
  • Timon Heide
  • Benjamin Werner
  • Marc J Williams
  • Weini Huang
  • Giulio Caravagna
  • Trevor A Graham
  • Andrea Sottoriva

Abstract

Quantification of the effect of spatial tumour sampling on the patterns of mutations detected in next-generation sequencing data is largely lacking. Here we use a spatial stochastic cellular automaton model of tumour growth that accounts for somatic mutations, selection, drift and spatial constraints, to simulate multi-region sequencing data derived from spatial sampling of a neoplasm. We show that the spatial structure of a solid cancer has a major impact on the detection of clonal selection and genetic drift from both bulk and single-cell sequencing data. Our results indicate that spatial constrains can introduce significant sampling biases when performing multi-region bulk sampling and that such bias becomes a major confounding factor for the measurement of the evolutionary dynamics of human tumours. We also propose a statistical inference framework that incorporates spatial effects within a growing tumour and so represents a further step forwards in the inference of evolutionary dynamics from genomic data. Our analysis shows that measuring cancer evolution using next-generation sequencing while accounting for the numerous confounding factors remains challenging. However, mechanistic model-based approaches have the potential to capture the sources of noise and better interpret the data.Author summary: Sequencing the DNA of cancer cells from human tumours has become one of the main tools to study cancer biology. However, sequencing data are complex and often difficult to interpret. In particular, the way in which the tissue is sampled and the data are collected impact the interpretation of the results significantly. We argue that understanding cancer genomic data requires mechanistic mathematical and computational models that tell us what we expect the data to look like, with the aim of understanding the impact of confounding factors and biases in the data generation step. In this study, we develop a spatial computational model of tumour growth that also simulates the data generation process, and demonstrate that biases in the sampling step and current technological limitations severely impact the interpretation of the results. We then provide a statistical framework that can be used to start overcoming these biases and more robustly measure aspects of the biology of tumours from the data.

Suggested Citation

  • Ketevan Chkhaidze & Timon Heide & Benjamin Werner & Marc J Williams & Weini Huang & Giulio Caravagna & Trevor A Graham & Andrea Sottoriva, 2019. "Spatially constrained tumour growth affects the patterns of clonal selection and neutral drift in cancer genomic data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-26, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007243
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007243
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007243&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007243?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.