IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1006988.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Approximate Bayesian estimation of coevolutionary arms races

Author

Listed:
  • Scott L Nuismer
  • Bob Week

Abstract

Exaggerated traits involved in species interactions have long captivated the imagination of evolutionary biologists and inspired the durable metaphor of the coevolutionary arms race. Despite decades of research, however, we have only a handful of examples where reciprocal coevolutionary change has been rigorously established as the cause of trait exaggeration. Support for a coevolutionary mechanism remains elusive because we lack generally applicable tools for quantifying the intensity of coevolutionary selection. Here we develop an approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) approach for estimating the intensity of coevolutionary selection using population mean phenotypes of traits mediating interspecific interactions. Our approach relaxes important assumptions of a previous maximum likelihood approach by allowing gene flow among populations, variable abiotic environments, and strong coevolutionary selection. Using simulated data, we show that our ABC method accurately infers the strength of coevolutionary selection if reliable estimates are available for key background parameters and ten or more populations are sampled. Applying our approach to the putative arms race between the plant Camellia japonica and its seed predatory weevil, Curculio camelliae, provides support for a coevolutionary hypothesis but fails to preclude the possibility of unilateral evolution. Comparing independently estimated selection gradients acting on Camellia pericarp thickness with values simulated by our model reveals a correlation between predicted and observed selection gradients of 0.941. The strong agreement between predicted and observed selection gradients validates our method.Author summary: Exaggerated traits involved in species interactions, such as extreme running speeds in predator and prey, have long captivated the imagination of evolutionary biologists and inspired the durable metaphor of the coevolutionary arms race. Despite decades of research, however, we have only a handful of examples where coevolution has been rigorously established as the cause of trait exaggeration. The reason support for a coevolutionary mechanism remains elusive is that we lack generally applicable tools for quantifying the intensity of coevolution. Here we develop a computational approach for estimating the intensity of coevolutionary selection (ABC Coevolution) and illustrate its use by applying the method to a well-studied interaction between the plant Camellia japonica and its seed predatory weevil, Curculio camelliae. Our results provide support for a coevolutionary hypothesis but fail to preclude the possibility of unilateral evolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott L Nuismer & Bob Week, 2019. "Approximate Bayesian estimation of coevolutionary arms races," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006988
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006988
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006988
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006988&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006988?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.