IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1006112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

RosettaAntibodyDesign (RAbD): A general framework for computational antibody design

Author

Listed:
  • Jared Adolf-Bryfogle
  • Oleks Kalyuzhniy
  • Michael Kubitz
  • Brian D Weitzner
  • Xiaozhen Hu
  • Yumiko Adachi
  • William R Schief
  • Roland L Dunbrack Jr.

Abstract

A structural-bioinformatics-based computational methodology and framework have been developed for the design of antibodies to targets of interest. RosettaAntibodyDesign (RAbD) samples the diverse sequence, structure, and binding space of an antibody to an antigen in highly customizable protocols for the design of antibodies in a broad range of applications. The program samples antibody sequences and structures by grafting structures from a widely accepted set of the canonical clusters of CDRs (North et al., J. Mol. Biol., 406:228–256, 2011). It then performs sequence design according to amino acid sequence profiles of each cluster, and samples CDR backbones using a flexible-backbone design protocol incorporating cluster-based CDR constraints. Starting from an existing experimental or computationally modeled antigen-antibody structure, RAbD can be used to redesign a single CDR or multiple CDRs with loops of different length, conformation, and sequence. We rigorously benchmarked RAbD on a set of 60 diverse antibody–antigen complexes, using two design strategies—optimizing total Rosetta energy and optimizing interface energy alone. We utilized two novel metrics for measuring success in computational protein design. The design risk ratio (DRR) is equal to the frequency of recovery of native CDR lengths and clusters divided by the frequency of sampling of those features during the Monte Carlo design procedure. Ratios greater than 1.0 indicate that the design process is picking out the native more frequently than expected from their sampled rate. We achieved DRRs for the non-H3 CDRs of between 2.4 and 4.0. The antigen risk ratio (ARR) is the ratio of frequencies of the native amino acid types, CDR lengths, and clusters in the output decoys for simulations performed in the presence and absence of the antigen. For CDRs, we achieved cluster ARRs as high as 2.5 for L1 and 1.5 for H2. For sequence design simulations without CDR grafting, the overall recovery for the native amino acid types for residues that contact the antigen in the native structures was 72% in simulations performed in the presence of the antigen and 48% in simulations performed without the antigen, for an ARR of 1.5. For the non-contacting residues, the ARR was 1.08. This shows that the sequence profiles are able to maintain the amino acid types of these conserved, buried sites, while recovery of the exposed, contacting residues requires the presence of the antigen-antibody interface. We tested RAbD experimentally on both a lambda and kappa antibody–antigen complex, successfully improving their affinities 10 to 50 fold by replacing individual CDRs of the native antibody with new CDR lengths and clusters.Author summary: Antibodies are proteins produced by the immune system to attack infections and cancer and are also used as drugs to treat cancer and autoimmune diseases. The mechanism that has evolved to produce them is able to make 10s of millions of different antibodies, each with a different surface used to bind the foreign or mutated molecule. We have developed a method to design antibodies computationally, based on the 1000s of experimentally determined three-dimensional structures of antibodies available. The method works by treating pieces of these structures as a collection of parts that can be combined in new ways to make better antibodies. Our method has been implemented in the protein modeling program Rosetta, and is called RosettaAntibodyDesign (RAbD). We tested RAbD both computationally and experimentally. The experimental test shows that we can improve existing antibodies by 10 to 50 fold, paving the way for design of entirely new antibodies in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Jared Adolf-Bryfogle & Oleks Kalyuzhniy & Michael Kubitz & Brian D Weitzner & Xiaozhen Hu & Yumiko Adachi & William R Schief & Roland L Dunbrack Jr., 2018. "RosettaAntibodyDesign (RAbD): A general framework for computational antibody design," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-38, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006112
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006112
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006112&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006112?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarel J Fleishman & Andrew Leaver-Fay & Jacob E Corn & Eva-Maria Strauch & Sagar D Khare & Nobuyasu Koga & Justin Ashworth & Paul Murphy & Florian Richter & Gordon Lemmon & Jens Meiler & David Baker, 2011. "RosettaScripts: A Scripting Language Interface to the Rosetta Macromolecular Modeling Suite," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-10, June.
    2. Rhiju Das, 2013. "Atomic-Accuracy Prediction of Protein Loop Structures through an RNA-Inspired Ansatz," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-17, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jeffrey A. Ruffolo & Lee-Shin Chu & Sai Pooja Mahajan & Jeffrey J. Gray, 2023. "Fast, accurate antibody structure prediction from deep learning on massive set of natural antibodies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Thillai V. Sekar & Eslam A. Elghonaimy & Katy L. Swancutt & Sebastian Diegeler & Isaac Gonzalez & Cassandra Hamilton & Peter Q. Leung & Jens Meiler & Cristina E. Martina & Michael Whitney & Todd A. Ag, 2023. "Simultaneous selection of nanobodies for accessible epitopes on immune cells in the tumor microenvironment," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Ellis & Julia Lederhofer & Oliver J. Acton & Yaroslav Tsybovsky & Sally Kephart & Christina Yap & Rebecca A. Gillespie & Adrian Creanga & Audrey Olshefsky & Tyler Stephens & Deleah Pettie & Mic, 2022. "Structure-based design of stabilized recombinant influenza neuraminidase tetramers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Thomas W. Linsky & Kyle Noble & Autumn R. Tobin & Rachel Crow & Lauren Carter & Jeffrey L. Urbauer & David Baker & Eva-Maria Strauch, 2022. "Sampling of structure and sequence space of small protein folds," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Alexander M Sevy & Tim M Jacobs & James E Crowe Jr. & Jens Meiler, 2015. "Design of Protein Multi-specificity Using an Independent Sequence Search Reduces the Barrier to Low Energy Sequences," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, July.
    4. Jonathan Yaacov Weinstein & Carlos Martí-Gómez & Rosalie Lipsh-Sokolik & Shlomo Yakir Hoch & Demian Liebermann & Reinat Nevo & Haim Weissman & Ekaterina Petrovich-Kopitman & David Margulies & Dmitry I, 2023. "Designed active-site library reveals thousands of functional GFP variants," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Vishruth Mullapudi & Jaime Vaquer-Alicea & Vaibhav Bommareddy & Anthony R. Vega & Bryan D. Ryder & Charles L. White & Marc. I. Diamond & Lukasz A. Joachimiak, 2023. "Network of hotspot interactions cluster tau amyloid folds," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. P. Konstantin Richter & Paula Blázquez-Sánchez & Ziyue Zhao & Felipe Engelberger & Christian Wiebeler & Georg Künze & Ronny Frank & Dana Krinke & Emanuele Frezzotti & Yuliia Lihanova & Patricia Falken, 2023. "Structure and function of the metagenomic plastic-degrading polyester hydrolase PHL7 bound to its product," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    7. Jorge Roel-Touris & Marta Nadal & Enrique Marcos, 2023. "Single-chain dimers from de novo immunoglobulins as robust scaffolds for multiple binding loops," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Diego del Alamo & Kevin L Jagessar & Jens Meiler & Hassane S Mchaourab, 2021. "Methodology for rigorous modeling of protein conformational changes by Rosetta using DEER Distance Restraints," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-18, June.
    9. Julia Skokowa & Birte Hernandez Alvarez & Murray Coles & Malte Ritter & Masoud Nasri & Jérémy Haaf & Narges Aghaallaei & Yun Xu & Perihan Mir & Ann-Christin Krahl & Katherine W. Rogers & Kateryna Maks, 2022. "A topological refactoring design strategy yields highly stable granulopoietic proteins," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Tamuka M. Chidyausiku & Soraia R. Mendes & Jason C. Klima & Marta Nadal & Ulrich Eckhard & Jorge Roel-Touris & Scott Houliston & Tibisay Guevara & Hugh K. Haddox & Adam Moyer & Cheryl H. Arrowsmith & , 2022. "De novo design of immunoglobulin-like domains," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Jaume Bonet & Sarah Wehrle & Karen Schriever & Che Yang & Anne Billet & Fabian Sesterhenn & Andreas Scheck & Freyr Sverrisson & Barbora Veselkova & Sabrina Vollers & Roxanne Lourman & Mélanie Villard , 2018. "Rosetta FunFolDes – A general framework for the computational design of functional proteins," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-30, November.
    12. Sowmiya Palani & Yuka Machida & Julia R. Alvey & Vandana Mishra & Allison L. Welter & Gaofeng Cui & Benoît Bragantini & Maria Victoria Botuyan & Anh T. Q. Cong & Georges Mer & Matthew J. Schellenberg , 2024. "Dimerization-dependent serine protease activity of FAM111A prevents replication fork stalling at topoisomerase 1 cleavage complexes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Kristin J. Adolfsen & Isolde Callihan & Catherine E. Monahan & Per Jr. Greisen & James Spoonamore & Munira Momin & Lauren E. Fitch & Mary Joan Castillo & Lindong Weng & Lauren Renaud & Carl J. Weile &, 2021. "Improvement of a synthetic live bacterial therapeutic for phenylketonuria with biosensor-enabled enzyme engineering," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Karen J. Gonzalez & Jiachen Huang & Miria F. Criado & Avik Banerjee & Stephen M. Tompkins & Jarrod J. Mousa & Eva-Maria Strauch, 2024. "A general computational design strategy for stabilizing viral class I fusion proteins," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Edward King & Sarah Maxel & Yulai Zhang & Karissa C. Kenney & Youtian Cui & Emma Luu & Justin B. Siegel & Gregory A. Weiss & Ray Luo & Han Li, 2022. "Orthogonal glycolytic pathway enables directed evolution of noncanonical cofactor oxidase," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Xinlei Zhuang & Zhe Wang & Jiansheng Fan & Xuefei Bai & Yingchun Xu & James J. Chou & Tingjun Hou & Shuqing Chen & Liqiang Pan, 2022. "Structure-guided and phage-assisted evolution of a therapeutic anti-EGFR antibody to reverse acquired resistance," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.