IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1005882.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feature reliability determines specificity and transfer of perceptual learning in orientation search

Author

Listed:
  • Amit Yashar
  • Rachel N Denison

Abstract

Training can modify the visual system to produce a substantial improvement on perceptual tasks and therefore has applications for treating visual deficits. Visual perceptual learning (VPL) is often specific to the trained feature, which gives insight into processes underlying brain plasticity, but limits VPL’s effectiveness in rehabilitation. Under what circumstances VPL transfers to untrained stimuli is poorly understood. Here we report a qualitatively new phenomenon: intrinsic variation in the representation of features determines the transfer of VPL. Orientations around cardinal are represented more reliably than orientations around oblique in V1, which has been linked to behavioral consequences such as visual search asymmetries. We studied VPL for visual search of near-cardinal or oblique targets among distractors of the other orientation while controlling for other display and task attributes, including task precision, task difficulty, and stimulus exposure. Learning was the same in all training conditions; however, transfer depended on the orientation of the target, with full transfer of learning from near-cardinal to oblique targets but not the reverse. To evaluate the idea that representational reliability was the key difference between the orientations in determining VPL transfer, we created a model that combined orientation-dependent reliability, improvement of reliability with learning, and an optimal search strategy. Modeling suggested that not only search asymmetries but also the asymmetric transfer of VPL depended on preexisting differences between the reliability of near-cardinal and oblique representations. Transfer asymmetries in model behavior also depended on having different learning rates for targets and distractors, such that greater learning for low-reliability distractors facilitated transfer. These findings suggest that training on sensory features with intrinsically low reliability may maximize the generalizability of learning in complex visual environments.Author summary: Training can modify the visual system to produce improvements on perceptual tasks (visual perceptual learning), which is associated with adult brain plasticity. Visual perceptual learning has important clinical applications: it improves the vision of adults with visual deficits, e.g. amblyopia and cortical blindness, and even presbyopia (aging eye). A critical issue in visual perceptual learning is its specificity to the trained stimulus. Specificity gives insight into the processes underling experience-dependent plasticity but can be an obstacle in the development of efficient rehabilitation protocols. Under what circumstances visual perceptual learning transfers to untrained stimuli is poorly understood. Here we report a qualitatively new phenomenon: specificity in visual search depends on intrinsic variations in the reliability of feature representations; e.g., vertically oriented lines are represented in V1 with greater reliability than tilted lines. Our data and computational model suggest that training on sensory features with intrinsically low reliability can maximize the generalizability of learning, particularly in complex natural environments in which task performance is limited by low-reliability features. Our study has possible implications for the development of efficient clinical applications of perceptual learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Amit Yashar & Rachel N Denison, 2017. "Feature reliability determines specificity and transfer of perceptual learning in orientation search," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005882
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005882
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005882&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005882?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.